Variation in distress among women with infertility: Evidence from a population-based sample

Arthur L. Greil, Karina M. Shreffler, Lone Schmidt, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We examine variation in fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress according to different experiences of infertility among 1027 US women who have experienced infertility within the previous 10 years. Methods: General distress was measured by a short form of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression. Multiple regression analysis was conducted on self-report data (based on a telephone interview) from a probability-based sample of US women aged 2545 years. We compare women with infertility who have had a prior pregnancy (secondary infertility, n=628) to women with infertility with no prior pregnancies (primary infertility, n=399). We further distinguish between women with infertility who were actually 'trying' to become pregnant (the infertile with intent) with those who met the medical definition of infertile but did not describe themselves as trying to become pregnant (infertile without intent). Results: Both types of infertility (primary versus secondary) (β 0.31 (*)) and intentionality (infertile with and without intent) (β 0.08 (*)) are associated with FSD. These associations persist when we control for resource and demographic variables, life course variables, social support and social pressure variables. General distress does not vary by infertility type or intentionality. Conclusions: Results reveal variation in womens recalled experiences of infertility and that FSD is more sensitive to effects of different experiences than general distress. Women with primary infertility who were explicitly trying to become pregnant at the time of the infertility episode stand out as a particularly distressed group. Caregivers should be aware that the emotional needs of women with primary infertility may differ from those with secondary infertility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2101-2112
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infertility
Population
Fertility
Pregnancy
Sampling Studies
Social Support
Self Report
Caregivers
Epidemiologic Studies
Regression Analysis
Demography
Interviews
Pressure

Keywords

  • fertility-specific distress
  • infertility
  • population-based study
  • pregnancy intentionality
  • women

Cite this

Greil, Arthur L. ; Shreffler, Karina M. ; Schmidt, Lone ; McQuillan, Julia. / Variation in distress among women with infertility : Evidence from a population-based sample. In: Human Reproduction. 2011 ; Vol. 26, No. 8. pp. 2101-2112.
@article{99a1e587a51a46279ff34a8cc253b779,
title = "Variation in distress among women with infertility: Evidence from a population-based sample",
abstract = "Background: We examine variation in fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress according to different experiences of infertility among 1027 US women who have experienced infertility within the previous 10 years. Methods: General distress was measured by a short form of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression. Multiple regression analysis was conducted on self-report data (based on a telephone interview) from a probability-based sample of US women aged 2545 years. We compare women with infertility who have had a prior pregnancy (secondary infertility, n=628) to women with infertility with no prior pregnancies (primary infertility, n=399). We further distinguish between women with infertility who were actually 'trying' to become pregnant (the infertile with intent) with those who met the medical definition of infertile but did not describe themselves as trying to become pregnant (infertile without intent). Results: Both types of infertility (primary versus secondary) (β 0.31 (*)) and intentionality (infertile with and without intent) (β 0.08 (*)) are associated with FSD. These associations persist when we control for resource and demographic variables, life course variables, social support and social pressure variables. General distress does not vary by infertility type or intentionality. Conclusions: Results reveal variation in womens recalled experiences of infertility and that FSD is more sensitive to effects of different experiences than general distress. Women with primary infertility who were explicitly trying to become pregnant at the time of the infertility episode stand out as a particularly distressed group. Caregivers should be aware that the emotional needs of women with primary infertility may differ from those with secondary infertility.",
keywords = "fertility-specific distress, infertility, population-based study, pregnancy intentionality, women",
author = "Greil, {Arthur L.} and Shreffler, {Karina M.} and Lone Schmidt and Julia McQuillan",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/der148",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "2101--2112",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

Variation in distress among women with infertility : Evidence from a population-based sample. / Greil, Arthur L.; Shreffler, Karina M.; Schmidt, Lone; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 26, No. 8, 01.01.2011, p. 2101-2112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in distress among women with infertility

T2 - Evidence from a population-based sample

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - Shreffler, Karina M.

AU - Schmidt, Lone

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Background: We examine variation in fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress according to different experiences of infertility among 1027 US women who have experienced infertility within the previous 10 years. Methods: General distress was measured by a short form of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression. Multiple regression analysis was conducted on self-report data (based on a telephone interview) from a probability-based sample of US women aged 2545 years. We compare women with infertility who have had a prior pregnancy (secondary infertility, n=628) to women with infertility with no prior pregnancies (primary infertility, n=399). We further distinguish between women with infertility who were actually 'trying' to become pregnant (the infertile with intent) with those who met the medical definition of infertile but did not describe themselves as trying to become pregnant (infertile without intent). Results: Both types of infertility (primary versus secondary) (β 0.31 (*)) and intentionality (infertile with and without intent) (β 0.08 (*)) are associated with FSD. These associations persist when we control for resource and demographic variables, life course variables, social support and social pressure variables. General distress does not vary by infertility type or intentionality. Conclusions: Results reveal variation in womens recalled experiences of infertility and that FSD is more sensitive to effects of different experiences than general distress. Women with primary infertility who were explicitly trying to become pregnant at the time of the infertility episode stand out as a particularly distressed group. Caregivers should be aware that the emotional needs of women with primary infertility may differ from those with secondary infertility.

AB - Background: We examine variation in fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress according to different experiences of infertility among 1027 US women who have experienced infertility within the previous 10 years. Methods: General distress was measured by a short form of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression. Multiple regression analysis was conducted on self-report data (based on a telephone interview) from a probability-based sample of US women aged 2545 years. We compare women with infertility who have had a prior pregnancy (secondary infertility, n=628) to women with infertility with no prior pregnancies (primary infertility, n=399). We further distinguish between women with infertility who were actually 'trying' to become pregnant (the infertile with intent) with those who met the medical definition of infertile but did not describe themselves as trying to become pregnant (infertile without intent). Results: Both types of infertility (primary versus secondary) (β 0.31 (*)) and intentionality (infertile with and without intent) (β 0.08 (*)) are associated with FSD. These associations persist when we control for resource and demographic variables, life course variables, social support and social pressure variables. General distress does not vary by infertility type or intentionality. Conclusions: Results reveal variation in womens recalled experiences of infertility and that FSD is more sensitive to effects of different experiences than general distress. Women with primary infertility who were explicitly trying to become pregnant at the time of the infertility episode stand out as a particularly distressed group. Caregivers should be aware that the emotional needs of women with primary infertility may differ from those with secondary infertility.

KW - fertility-specific distress

KW - infertility

KW - population-based study

KW - pregnancy intentionality

KW - women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960546930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/der148

DO - 10.1093/humrep/der148

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960546930

VL - 26

SP - 2101

EP - 2112

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 8

ER -