Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: A cross-sectional review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Setting Not applicable. Participants RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section. Outcome measures Completeness of reporting. Results Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50% of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75% of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported. Conclusions Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere032024
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
PubMed
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • addiction
  • clinical trials
  • CONSORT
  • reporting quality

Cite this

@article{1c7b0169156642f39250a6a7b0575b53,
title = "Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: A cross-sectional review",
abstract = "Objectives Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Setting Not applicable. Participants RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section. Outcome measures Completeness of reporting. Results Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50{\%} of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75{\%} of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported. Conclusions Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.",
keywords = "addiction, clinical trials, CONSORT, reporting quality",
author = "Matthew Vassar and Sam Jellison and Hannah Wendelbo and Cole Wayant and Harrison Gray and Michael Bibens",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials

T2 - A cross-sectional review

AU - Vassar, Matthew

AU - Jellison, Sam

AU - Wendelbo, Hannah

AU - Wayant, Cole

AU - Gray, Harrison

AU - Bibens, Michael

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objectives Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Setting Not applicable. Participants RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section. Outcome measures Completeness of reporting. Results Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50% of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75% of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported. Conclusions Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.

AB - Objectives Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Setting Not applicable. Participants RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section. Outcome measures Completeness of reporting. Results Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50% of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75% of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported. Conclusions Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.

KW - addiction

KW - clinical trials

KW - CONSORT

KW - reporting quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071896731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024

M3 - Article

C2 - 31494625

AN - SCOPUS:85071896731

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e032024

ER -