The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players

Brennan J. Thompson, Doug B. Smith, Bert H. Jacobson, Ryan E. Fiddler, Aric Warren, Blaine C. Long, Matthew O'Brien, K. Lee Everett, Rob G. Glass, Eric D. Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lineman and nonlineman division I collegiate football players and to examine the influence of 2 normalization procedures: (a) simple ratio scaling and (b) standardized allometric scaling. Ten lineman (mean ± SD: age = 19.3 ± 1.6 years; height = 187.7 ± 4.7 cm; mass = 127.7 ± 13.3 kg) and 14 nonlineman (19.6 ± 1.4 years; 181.8 ± 5.2 cm; 92.3 ± 10.6 kg) performed a multiple repetition bench press power test at 50% of their 1 repetition maximum. Peak power (PP) was determined from a Tendo weightlifting analyzer that was attached to the barbell. The PP values were then analyzed under 3 conditions that included: (a) no scaling (absolute values), (b) ratio scaling (PP body mass-1), and (c) allometric scaling (PP body mass-0.67). The results indicated that the larger lineman demonstrated greater absolute PP values (p = 0.02); however, ratio scaling favored the smaller nonlineman group (p = 0.04). There were no differences in PP values between positions after the standardized allometric scaling procedure (p = 0.60). These findings indicated that the standardized allometric scaling procedure may be a more effective method for normalizing PP values among elite division I collegiate football players.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2269-2273
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Football

Keywords

  • Bench press
  • Elite athletes
  • Relative power

Cite this

Thompson, Brennan J. ; Smith, Doug B. ; Jacobson, Bert H. ; Fiddler, Ryan E. ; Warren, Aric ; Long, Blaine C. ; O'Brien, Matthew ; Everett, K. Lee ; Glass, Rob G. ; Ryan, Eric D. / The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 2269-2273.
@article{d3a84aab39e34fd6a2187659fb3b8b2f,
title = "The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players",
abstract = "The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lineman and nonlineman division I collegiate football players and to examine the influence of 2 normalization procedures: (a) simple ratio scaling and (b) standardized allometric scaling. Ten lineman (mean ± SD: age = 19.3 ± 1.6 years; height = 187.7 ± 4.7 cm; mass = 127.7 ± 13.3 kg) and 14 nonlineman (19.6 ± 1.4 years; 181.8 ± 5.2 cm; 92.3 ± 10.6 kg) performed a multiple repetition bench press power test at 50{\%} of their 1 repetition maximum. Peak power (PP) was determined from a Tendo weightlifting analyzer that was attached to the barbell. The PP values were then analyzed under 3 conditions that included: (a) no scaling (absolute values), (b) ratio scaling (PP body mass-1), and (c) allometric scaling (PP body mass-0.67). The results indicated that the larger lineman demonstrated greater absolute PP values (p = 0.02); however, ratio scaling favored the smaller nonlineman group (p = 0.04). There were no differences in PP values between positions after the standardized allometric scaling procedure (p = 0.60). These findings indicated that the standardized allometric scaling procedure may be a more effective method for normalizing PP values among elite division I collegiate football players.",
keywords = "Bench press, Elite athletes, Relative power",
author = "Thompson, {Brennan J.} and Smith, {Doug B.} and Jacobson, {Bert H.} and Fiddler, {Ryan E.} and Aric Warren and Long, {Blaine C.} and Matthew O'Brien and Everett, {K. Lee} and Glass, {Rob G.} and Ryan, {Eric D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e4f5bc",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "2269--2273",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "9",

}

The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players. / Thompson, Brennan J.; Smith, Doug B.; Jacobson, Bert H.; Fiddler, Ryan E.; Warren, Aric; Long, Blaine C.; O'Brien, Matthew; Everett, K. Lee; Glass, Rob G.; Ryan, Eric D.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 24, No. 9, 01.09.2010, p. 2269-2273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players

AU - Thompson, Brennan J.

AU - Smith, Doug B.

AU - Jacobson, Bert H.

AU - Fiddler, Ryan E.

AU - Warren, Aric

AU - Long, Blaine C.

AU - O'Brien, Matthew

AU - Everett, K. Lee

AU - Glass, Rob G.

AU - Ryan, Eric D.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lineman and nonlineman division I collegiate football players and to examine the influence of 2 normalization procedures: (a) simple ratio scaling and (b) standardized allometric scaling. Ten lineman (mean ± SD: age = 19.3 ± 1.6 years; height = 187.7 ± 4.7 cm; mass = 127.7 ± 13.3 kg) and 14 nonlineman (19.6 ± 1.4 years; 181.8 ± 5.2 cm; 92.3 ± 10.6 kg) performed a multiple repetition bench press power test at 50% of their 1 repetition maximum. Peak power (PP) was determined from a Tendo weightlifting analyzer that was attached to the barbell. The PP values were then analyzed under 3 conditions that included: (a) no scaling (absolute values), (b) ratio scaling (PP body mass-1), and (c) allometric scaling (PP body mass-0.67). The results indicated that the larger lineman demonstrated greater absolute PP values (p = 0.02); however, ratio scaling favored the smaller nonlineman group (p = 0.04). There were no differences in PP values between positions after the standardized allometric scaling procedure (p = 0.60). These findings indicated that the standardized allometric scaling procedure may be a more effective method for normalizing PP values among elite division I collegiate football players.

AB - The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lineman and nonlineman division I collegiate football players and to examine the influence of 2 normalization procedures: (a) simple ratio scaling and (b) standardized allometric scaling. Ten lineman (mean ± SD: age = 19.3 ± 1.6 years; height = 187.7 ± 4.7 cm; mass = 127.7 ± 13.3 kg) and 14 nonlineman (19.6 ± 1.4 years; 181.8 ± 5.2 cm; 92.3 ± 10.6 kg) performed a multiple repetition bench press power test at 50% of their 1 repetition maximum. Peak power (PP) was determined from a Tendo weightlifting analyzer that was attached to the barbell. The PP values were then analyzed under 3 conditions that included: (a) no scaling (absolute values), (b) ratio scaling (PP body mass-1), and (c) allometric scaling (PP body mass-0.67). The results indicated that the larger lineman demonstrated greater absolute PP values (p = 0.02); however, ratio scaling favored the smaller nonlineman group (p = 0.04). There were no differences in PP values between positions after the standardized allometric scaling procedure (p = 0.60). These findings indicated that the standardized allometric scaling procedure may be a more effective method for normalizing PP values among elite division I collegiate football players.

KW - Bench press

KW - Elite athletes

KW - Relative power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956933023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e4f5bc

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e4f5bc

M3 - Article

C2 - 20683356

AN - SCOPUS:77956933023

VL - 24

SP - 2269

EP - 2273

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 9

ER -