The Effects of Requiring Parental Consent for Research on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors: A Meta-analysis

Chao Liu, Ronald B. Cox, Isaac J. Washburn, Julie Croff, Hugh C. Crethar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Requiring parental consent may result in sampling biases that confound scientific conclusions and stifle the representation of children most at risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether active parental consent, compared with passive parental consent, creates a bias in response rate, demographic makeup, and adverse outcomes in adolescent samples. Methods A meta-analysis was performed on peer-reviewed articles and unpublished dissertations from 1975 to 2016 in five computerized databases ERIC, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed and ProQuest. Quantitative studies were retained if they included the following keywords: active consent (or informed consent or parental consent), passive consent (or waiver of consent), risk behavior, adolescen*. Results Fifteen studies were identified with a total number of 104,074 children. Results showed (1) response rates were significantly lower for studies using active consent procedure than those using passive consent procedure (Z = 3.05, p =.002); (2) more females, younger participants, and less African-Americans were included in studies using active consent procedures than studies using passive procedures (Z = −2.73, p =.006; Z = −12.06, p <.00001; Z = 2.19, p =.03, respectively); (3) studies with passive consent procedures showed higher rates of self-reported substance use than studies using active consent procedures (Z = 3.07, p =.002). Conclusions Requiring active parental consent can lead to a systematic bias in the sample where the population under study is misrepresented. Institutional review board committees should collaborate with researchers to find solutions that protect minors without silencing the voice of high-risk youth in the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Parental Consent
Adolescent Behavior
Risk-Taking
Meta-Analysis
Research
Stifle
Minors
Selection Bias
Research Ethics Committees
Advisory Committees
Informed Consent
PubMed
MEDLINE
African Americans
Research Personnel
Demography
Databases

Keywords

  • Active consent
  • Adolescents
  • Meta-analysis
  • Parental consent
  • Passive consent
  • Risk behaviors

Cite this

Liu, Chao ; Cox, Ronald B. ; Washburn, Isaac J. ; Croff, Julie ; Crethar, Hugh C. / The Effects of Requiring Parental Consent for Research on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors : A Meta-analysis. In: Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 45-52.
@article{2da4b27b1b37445ea7dfa3c3840ed8f6,
title = "The Effects of Requiring Parental Consent for Research on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors: A Meta-analysis",
abstract = "Purpose Requiring parental consent may result in sampling biases that confound scientific conclusions and stifle the representation of children most at risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether active parental consent, compared with passive parental consent, creates a bias in response rate, demographic makeup, and adverse outcomes in adolescent samples. Methods A meta-analysis was performed on peer-reviewed articles and unpublished dissertations from 1975 to 2016 in five computerized databases ERIC, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed and ProQuest. Quantitative studies were retained if they included the following keywords: active consent (or informed consent or parental consent), passive consent (or waiver of consent), risk behavior, adolescen*. Results Fifteen studies were identified with a total number of 104,074 children. Results showed (1) response rates were significantly lower for studies using active consent procedure than those using passive consent procedure (Z = 3.05, p =.002); (2) more females, younger participants, and less African-Americans were included in studies using active consent procedures than studies using passive procedures (Z = −2.73, p =.006; Z = −12.06, p <.00001; Z = 2.19, p =.03, respectively); (3) studies with passive consent procedures showed higher rates of self-reported substance use than studies using active consent procedures (Z = 3.07, p =.002). Conclusions Requiring active parental consent can lead to a systematic bias in the sample where the population under study is misrepresented. Institutional review board committees should collaborate with researchers to find solutions that protect minors without silencing the voice of high-risk youth in the literature.",
keywords = "Active consent, Adolescents, Meta-analysis, Parental consent, Passive consent, Risk behaviors",
author = "Chao Liu and Cox, {Ronald B.} and Washburn, {Isaac J.} and Julie Croff and Crethar, {Hugh C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.01.015",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "45--52",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

The Effects of Requiring Parental Consent for Research on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors : A Meta-analysis. / Liu, Chao; Cox, Ronald B.; Washburn, Isaac J.; Croff, Julie; Crethar, Hugh C.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.07.2017, p. 45-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Requiring Parental Consent for Research on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors

T2 - A Meta-analysis

AU - Liu, Chao

AU - Cox, Ronald B.

AU - Washburn, Isaac J.

AU - Croff, Julie

AU - Crethar, Hugh C.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Purpose Requiring parental consent may result in sampling biases that confound scientific conclusions and stifle the representation of children most at risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether active parental consent, compared with passive parental consent, creates a bias in response rate, demographic makeup, and adverse outcomes in adolescent samples. Methods A meta-analysis was performed on peer-reviewed articles and unpublished dissertations from 1975 to 2016 in five computerized databases ERIC, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed and ProQuest. Quantitative studies were retained if they included the following keywords: active consent (or informed consent or parental consent), passive consent (or waiver of consent), risk behavior, adolescen*. Results Fifteen studies were identified with a total number of 104,074 children. Results showed (1) response rates were significantly lower for studies using active consent procedure than those using passive consent procedure (Z = 3.05, p =.002); (2) more females, younger participants, and less African-Americans were included in studies using active consent procedures than studies using passive procedures (Z = −2.73, p =.006; Z = −12.06, p <.00001; Z = 2.19, p =.03, respectively); (3) studies with passive consent procedures showed higher rates of self-reported substance use than studies using active consent procedures (Z = 3.07, p =.002). Conclusions Requiring active parental consent can lead to a systematic bias in the sample where the population under study is misrepresented. Institutional review board committees should collaborate with researchers to find solutions that protect minors without silencing the voice of high-risk youth in the literature.

AB - Purpose Requiring parental consent may result in sampling biases that confound scientific conclusions and stifle the representation of children most at risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether active parental consent, compared with passive parental consent, creates a bias in response rate, demographic makeup, and adverse outcomes in adolescent samples. Methods A meta-analysis was performed on peer-reviewed articles and unpublished dissertations from 1975 to 2016 in five computerized databases ERIC, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed and ProQuest. Quantitative studies were retained if they included the following keywords: active consent (or informed consent or parental consent), passive consent (or waiver of consent), risk behavior, adolescen*. Results Fifteen studies were identified with a total number of 104,074 children. Results showed (1) response rates were significantly lower for studies using active consent procedure than those using passive consent procedure (Z = 3.05, p =.002); (2) more females, younger participants, and less African-Americans were included in studies using active consent procedures than studies using passive procedures (Z = −2.73, p =.006; Z = −12.06, p <.00001; Z = 2.19, p =.03, respectively); (3) studies with passive consent procedures showed higher rates of self-reported substance use than studies using active consent procedures (Z = 3.07, p =.002). Conclusions Requiring active parental consent can lead to a systematic bias in the sample where the population under study is misrepresented. Institutional review board committees should collaborate with researchers to find solutions that protect minors without silencing the voice of high-risk youth in the literature.

KW - Active consent

KW - Adolescents

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Parental consent

KW - Passive consent

KW - Risk behaviors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016811967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.01.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 28363714

AN - SCOPUS:85016811967

VL - 61

SP - 45

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 1

ER -