TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects of Individual and Dual ACE Domains on Binge Drinking
T2 - Comparisons by Gender
AU - Giano, Zachary
AU - O’Neil, Andrew
AU - Hubach, Randolph D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) show predictive utility concerning binge drinking. However, the literature is limited by 1. a focus on cumulative ACEs with little regard to specific domains, 2. a focus on those with the highest ACE scores, and 3. little consideration for gender differences. These approaches are problematic as ACE categories are fundamentally different, yet little distinction is given to specific ACE domains. The current study investigates which individual and dual ACE domain combinations are associated with binge drinking. Methods: Data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2011-2017; N = 80,391). A series of ANCOVAs were conducted to determine the association between single and dual combination ACE domains and binge drinking. Results: Results show gendered effects of ACEs on binge drinking such that at 0, 1, and 2 ACEs, males reported statistically higher rates. For males with exactly two ACEs, combinations of either sexual abuse or family incarceration presented the highest levels of binge drinking- with the highest mean binge drinking score being the exact combination of the two. This contrasts with males with 1 ACE, where experiencing family incarceration or sexual abuse, as a single domain, did not represent significant risk above the average of having a single ACE. Conclusions: Results suggest that males may be resilient to either of these domains as singular events, yet when found in combination, may present a synergistic effect that increases the likelihood of binge drinking. Due to lower overall binge drinking rates, no significant patterns were found among females.
AB - Background: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) show predictive utility concerning binge drinking. However, the literature is limited by 1. a focus on cumulative ACEs with little regard to specific domains, 2. a focus on those with the highest ACE scores, and 3. little consideration for gender differences. These approaches are problematic as ACE categories are fundamentally different, yet little distinction is given to specific ACE domains. The current study investigates which individual and dual ACE domain combinations are associated with binge drinking. Methods: Data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2011-2017; N = 80,391). A series of ANCOVAs were conducted to determine the association between single and dual combination ACE domains and binge drinking. Results: Results show gendered effects of ACEs on binge drinking such that at 0, 1, and 2 ACEs, males reported statistically higher rates. For males with exactly two ACEs, combinations of either sexual abuse or family incarceration presented the highest levels of binge drinking- with the highest mean binge drinking score being the exact combination of the two. This contrasts with males with 1 ACE, where experiencing family incarceration or sexual abuse, as a single domain, did not represent significant risk above the average of having a single ACE. Conclusions: Results suggest that males may be resilient to either of these domains as singular events, yet when found in combination, may present a synergistic effect that increases the likelihood of binge drinking. Due to lower overall binge drinking rates, no significant patterns were found among females.
KW - ACEs
KW - Adverse childhood experiences
KW - Binge drinking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110845990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10826084.2021.1949604
DO - 10.1080/10826084.2021.1949604
M3 - Article
C2 - 34279181
AN - SCOPUS:85110845990
SN - 1082-6084
VL - 56
SP - 1642
EP - 1650
JO - Substance Use and Misuse
JF - Substance Use and Misuse
IS - 11
ER -