Suicide risk assessment in the emergency department: Are there any tools in the pipeline?

Aaron Bowers, Chase Meyer, Shannon Hillier, Mark Blubaugh, Brie Roepke, Michelle Farabough, Joshua Gordon, Matt Vassar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is estimated that as many as 1 in 10 individuals who complete suicide had been seen in emergency departments within the prior 2 months. However, very little evidence underlies the current recommendations on managing patients with suicidal ideation presenting to the emergency department. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) have developed clinical practice guidelines for the screening and treatment of patients with suicidal ideation who present to emergency departments. In this study we investigated the extent to which new and ongoing studies are being conducted to address the current limitations in suicide screening in emergency departments. Methods: We identified low-level recommendations in clinical practice guidelines that have been set forth by the ACEP and VA/DoD. PICO questions were then created to help identify relevant studies pertaining to screening patients with suicidal ideation in the emergency department. PICO questions were used to develop search strings, which were then used to locate studies from ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Results: Seventeen PICO questions were created for this study. We found 11 studies addressing gaps identified in the clinical practice guidelines. Of the 17 PICO questions created, 10 were being addressed by 11 studies. Conclusions: Little research is being done to improve suicide risk assessment tools in the emergency department. Further research in this area may decrease health care costs, improve patient care, and save the lives of those at risk of dying by suicide.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)630-636
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Suicide
Hospital Emergency Service
Suicidal Ideation
Practice Guidelines
Veterans
Research
Health Care Costs
Registries
Patient Care
Emergencies
Clinical Trials
Physicians

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Emergency
  • Risk
  • Screen
  • Suicide

Cite this

@article{e687c8e6d7ca441ca406ec95ca209a71,
title = "Suicide risk assessment in the emergency department: Are there any tools in the pipeline?",
abstract = "Background: It is estimated that as many as 1 in 10 individuals who complete suicide had been seen in emergency departments within the prior 2 months. However, very little evidence underlies the current recommendations on managing patients with suicidal ideation presenting to the emergency department. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) have developed clinical practice guidelines for the screening and treatment of patients with suicidal ideation who present to emergency departments. In this study we investigated the extent to which new and ongoing studies are being conducted to address the current limitations in suicide screening in emergency departments. Methods: We identified low-level recommendations in clinical practice guidelines that have been set forth by the ACEP and VA/DoD. PICO questions were then created to help identify relevant studies pertaining to screening patients with suicidal ideation in the emergency department. PICO questions were used to develop search strings, which were then used to locate studies from ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Results: Seventeen PICO questions were created for this study. We found 11 studies addressing gaps identified in the clinical practice guidelines. Of the 17 PICO questions created, 10 were being addressed by 11 studies. Conclusions: Little research is being done to improve suicide risk assessment tools in the emergency department. Further research in this area may decrease health care costs, improve patient care, and save the lives of those at risk of dying by suicide.",
keywords = "Assessment, Emergency, Risk, Screen, Suicide",
author = "Aaron Bowers and Chase Meyer and Shannon Hillier and Mark Blubaugh and Brie Roepke and Michelle Farabough and Joshua Gordon and Matt Vassar",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.044",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "630--636",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Suicide risk assessment in the emergency department : Are there any tools in the pipeline? / Bowers, Aaron; Meyer, Chase; Hillier, Shannon; Blubaugh, Mark; Roepke, Brie; Farabough, Michelle; Gordon, Joshua; Vassar, Matt.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 630-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suicide risk assessment in the emergency department

T2 - Are there any tools in the pipeline?

AU - Bowers, Aaron

AU - Meyer, Chase

AU - Hillier, Shannon

AU - Blubaugh, Mark

AU - Roepke, Brie

AU - Farabough, Michelle

AU - Gordon, Joshua

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: It is estimated that as many as 1 in 10 individuals who complete suicide had been seen in emergency departments within the prior 2 months. However, very little evidence underlies the current recommendations on managing patients with suicidal ideation presenting to the emergency department. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) have developed clinical practice guidelines for the screening and treatment of patients with suicidal ideation who present to emergency departments. In this study we investigated the extent to which new and ongoing studies are being conducted to address the current limitations in suicide screening in emergency departments. Methods: We identified low-level recommendations in clinical practice guidelines that have been set forth by the ACEP and VA/DoD. PICO questions were then created to help identify relevant studies pertaining to screening patients with suicidal ideation in the emergency department. PICO questions were used to develop search strings, which were then used to locate studies from ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Results: Seventeen PICO questions were created for this study. We found 11 studies addressing gaps identified in the clinical practice guidelines. Of the 17 PICO questions created, 10 were being addressed by 11 studies. Conclusions: Little research is being done to improve suicide risk assessment tools in the emergency department. Further research in this area may decrease health care costs, improve patient care, and save the lives of those at risk of dying by suicide.

AB - Background: It is estimated that as many as 1 in 10 individuals who complete suicide had been seen in emergency departments within the prior 2 months. However, very little evidence underlies the current recommendations on managing patients with suicidal ideation presenting to the emergency department. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) have developed clinical practice guidelines for the screening and treatment of patients with suicidal ideation who present to emergency departments. In this study we investigated the extent to which new and ongoing studies are being conducted to address the current limitations in suicide screening in emergency departments. Methods: We identified low-level recommendations in clinical practice guidelines that have been set forth by the ACEP and VA/DoD. PICO questions were then created to help identify relevant studies pertaining to screening patients with suicidal ideation in the emergency department. PICO questions were used to develop search strings, which were then used to locate studies from ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Results: Seventeen PICO questions were created for this study. We found 11 studies addressing gaps identified in the clinical practice guidelines. Of the 17 PICO questions created, 10 were being addressed by 11 studies. Conclusions: Little research is being done to improve suicide risk assessment tools in the emergency department. Further research in this area may decrease health care costs, improve patient care, and save the lives of those at risk of dying by suicide.

KW - Assessment

KW - Emergency

KW - Risk

KW - Screen

KW - Suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030171736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.044

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.044

M3 - Article

C2 - 28970025

AN - SCOPUS:85030171736

VL - 36

SP - 630

EP - 636

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 4

ER -