Structural mechanics of pachycephalosaur crania permitted head-butting behavior

Eric Snively, Andrew Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pachycephalosaurian dinosaurs have dorsally thickened crania and uniquely shaped frontoparietal domes in some genera, suggested as evidence for head- or flank-butting behavior. Trabeculae thought to have resisted impact compression are present as only one histological zone of some pachycephalosaur domes, and are surrounded superficially or replaced by thick compacta in adults. The capabilities of pachycephalosaurian crania for head-butting are testable by finite element analysis (FEA). FEA of 2- and 3-D dorsal skull shapes of adult Homalocephale and Pachycephalosaurus reveal that the domes could withstand considerable impact force at certain closing speeds, and that stress and strain would dissipate efficiently throughout the dorsal portion of the skull before reaching the brain. Greater vaulting of the dome permitted higher impact forces. An analysis restricted to the frontoparietal dome of a sub-adult pachycephalosaurine, with material properties corresponding to histological zones, shows higher compressive strain (not less) in the trabecular region. The trabecular zone, if present, would not have rigidly resisted compression but rather have allowed slight elastic compression and rebound. Modeled keratinous coverings of varying depth indicate reductions in force and energy transmission to underlying bone. FEA therefore leaves open the possibility of head-butting in both flat- and dome-headed pachycephalosaurs, especially at low collision speeds.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPalaeontologia Electronica
Volume11
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Behavior
  • Biomechanics
  • Dinosauria
  • Finite element analysis
  • Pachycephalosauria
  • Sexual selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structural mechanics of pachycephalosaur crania permitted head-butting behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this