Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection of Older Adults in the UCHealth Electronic Health Record: Assessing the First Three Years of Implementation

Korijna G. Valenti, Carmen Lewis, Zachary Giano, Jared Rieck, Rita Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) data collection in older adults from the UCHealth systems electronic health record. Methods: Data of older adults aged 55 and older were analyzed between January 2019 and December 2022. Prevalence of SOGI documentation based on four new SOGI-related questions were analyzed along with social history documentation. Results: Data were missing in reports (93% for sexual orientation and 96% for gender identity). Of 459,544 older adults potentially identifiable as a sexual or gender minority (SGM), 8.24% could be identified through other social history, and 91.76% could not. Data often returned a response of “undisclosed” (1.04%) or “unspecified” (98.79%), leaving.005% to represent the identifiable population of SGM minority adults. Conclusions: SOGI data often was not documented through questions recommended since January 2019. It is unlikely that.005% accurately represents the SGM older patient population as national estimates are between 7%-11%. Lower reported percentages of SGM older adults may lead to less recognition of patient needs, and thus less equitable and personalized care. Clinical Implications: These findings exemplify the need for evaluation strategies to be designed to improve SOGI collection with the primary goal of promoting equity and inclusion for SGM older adults.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Gerontologist
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Data collection
  • health equity
  • inclusivity
  • older adults
  • sexual orientation and gender identity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection of Older Adults in the UCHealth Electronic Health Record: Assessing the First Three Years of Implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this