Seasonal changes of body mass, body composition, and muscular performance in collegiate wrestlers

Thomas W. Buford, Douglas B. Smith, Matthew O'Brien, Aric Warren, Stephen J. Rossi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the physiological response of collegiate wrestlers to their competitive season. Methods: Eleven Division I collegiate wrestlers (mean ±SD; 19.45 ±1.13 y) volunteered and completed 4 testing sessions throughout the course of the collegiate wrestling season. Testing sessions were conducted pre-, mid-, and postseason, as well as before the national tournament. Testing consisted of weigh-in, skinfold body composition testing, and a 50-rep concentric, isokinetic leg extension muscle endurance test (180°/s). Muscular performance variables measured included peak torque, peak torque at fatigue, percent decline, and peak torque/body mass ratio. Results: A significant increase (P < .05) of 2.9% was observed for body mass between midseason and postseason. (2.38 kg). From pre- to postseason, a mean increase of 3.8% (3.1 kg) was observed for body mass. An increase (P < .05) in BF% of 2.9% was observed between prenationals and postseason. No significant differences (P > .05) were observed between consecutive time points for quadriceps peak torque; however, there was a significant increase (P < .05) between preseason and prenationals (23.39 N'm). Peak, torque at fatigue was greater (P < .05) at midseason than preseason, representing an increase of 9.82 N·m. Between midseason and prenationals testing, we observed, an 11 % increase (P < .05) in %DCLN. Finally, we noted an increase (P < .05) from. 0.6 to 0.69 in peak torque/body mass ratio between preseason and prenationals. Conclusions: Our results indicate that while force values seem to suffer at midseason, the wrestlers compensated and were strongest just before their national competition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-184
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Torque
Body Composition
Fatigue
Wrestling
Leg
Muscles

Keywords

  • Exercise performance
  • Exercise training
  • Muscle function
  • Sport
  • Strength

Cite this

@article{f7b735a8927046148e96719514301cfa,
title = "Seasonal changes of body mass, body composition, and muscular performance in collegiate wrestlers",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the physiological response of collegiate wrestlers to their competitive season. Methods: Eleven Division I collegiate wrestlers (mean ±SD; 19.45 ±1.13 y) volunteered and completed 4 testing sessions throughout the course of the collegiate wrestling season. Testing sessions were conducted pre-, mid-, and postseason, as well as before the national tournament. Testing consisted of weigh-in, skinfold body composition testing, and a 50-rep concentric, isokinetic leg extension muscle endurance test (180°/s). Muscular performance variables measured included peak torque, peak torque at fatigue, percent decline, and peak torque/body mass ratio. Results: A significant increase (P < .05) of 2.9{\%} was observed for body mass between midseason and postseason. (2.38 kg). From pre- to postseason, a mean increase of 3.8{\%} (3.1 kg) was observed for body mass. An increase (P < .05) in BF{\%} of 2.9{\%} was observed between prenationals and postseason. No significant differences (P > .05) were observed between consecutive time points for quadriceps peak torque; however, there was a significant increase (P < .05) between preseason and prenationals (23.39 N'm). Peak, torque at fatigue was greater (P < .05) at midseason than preseason, representing an increase of 9.82 N·m. Between midseason and prenationals testing, we observed, an 11 {\%} increase (P < .05) in {\%}DCLN. Finally, we noted an increase (P < .05) from. 0.6 to 0.69 in peak torque/body mass ratio between preseason and prenationals. Conclusions: Our results indicate that while force values seem to suffer at midseason, the wrestlers compensated and were strongest just before their national competition.",
keywords = "Exercise performance, Exercise training, Muscle function, Sport, Strength",
author = "Buford, {Thomas W.} and Smith, {Douglas B.} and Matthew O'Brien and Aric Warren and Rossi, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/ijspp.3.2.176",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "176--184",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance",
issn = "1555-0265",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Seasonal changes of body mass, body composition, and muscular performance in collegiate wrestlers. / Buford, Thomas W.; Smith, Douglas B.; O'Brien, Matthew; Warren, Aric; Rossi, Stephen J.

In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.01.2008, p. 176-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seasonal changes of body mass, body composition, and muscular performance in collegiate wrestlers

AU - Buford, Thomas W.

AU - Smith, Douglas B.

AU - O'Brien, Matthew

AU - Warren, Aric

AU - Rossi, Stephen J.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the physiological response of collegiate wrestlers to their competitive season. Methods: Eleven Division I collegiate wrestlers (mean ±SD; 19.45 ±1.13 y) volunteered and completed 4 testing sessions throughout the course of the collegiate wrestling season. Testing sessions were conducted pre-, mid-, and postseason, as well as before the national tournament. Testing consisted of weigh-in, skinfold body composition testing, and a 50-rep concentric, isokinetic leg extension muscle endurance test (180°/s). Muscular performance variables measured included peak torque, peak torque at fatigue, percent decline, and peak torque/body mass ratio. Results: A significant increase (P < .05) of 2.9% was observed for body mass between midseason and postseason. (2.38 kg). From pre- to postseason, a mean increase of 3.8% (3.1 kg) was observed for body mass. An increase (P < .05) in BF% of 2.9% was observed between prenationals and postseason. No significant differences (P > .05) were observed between consecutive time points for quadriceps peak torque; however, there was a significant increase (P < .05) between preseason and prenationals (23.39 N'm). Peak, torque at fatigue was greater (P < .05) at midseason than preseason, representing an increase of 9.82 N·m. Between midseason and prenationals testing, we observed, an 11 % increase (P < .05) in %DCLN. Finally, we noted an increase (P < .05) from. 0.6 to 0.69 in peak torque/body mass ratio between preseason and prenationals. Conclusions: Our results indicate that while force values seem to suffer at midseason, the wrestlers compensated and were strongest just before their national competition.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the physiological response of collegiate wrestlers to their competitive season. Methods: Eleven Division I collegiate wrestlers (mean ±SD; 19.45 ±1.13 y) volunteered and completed 4 testing sessions throughout the course of the collegiate wrestling season. Testing sessions were conducted pre-, mid-, and postseason, as well as before the national tournament. Testing consisted of weigh-in, skinfold body composition testing, and a 50-rep concentric, isokinetic leg extension muscle endurance test (180°/s). Muscular performance variables measured included peak torque, peak torque at fatigue, percent decline, and peak torque/body mass ratio. Results: A significant increase (P < .05) of 2.9% was observed for body mass between midseason and postseason. (2.38 kg). From pre- to postseason, a mean increase of 3.8% (3.1 kg) was observed for body mass. An increase (P < .05) in BF% of 2.9% was observed between prenationals and postseason. No significant differences (P > .05) were observed between consecutive time points for quadriceps peak torque; however, there was a significant increase (P < .05) between preseason and prenationals (23.39 N'm). Peak, torque at fatigue was greater (P < .05) at midseason than preseason, representing an increase of 9.82 N·m. Between midseason and prenationals testing, we observed, an 11 % increase (P < .05) in %DCLN. Finally, we noted an increase (P < .05) from. 0.6 to 0.69 in peak torque/body mass ratio between preseason and prenationals. Conclusions: Our results indicate that while force values seem to suffer at midseason, the wrestlers compensated and were strongest just before their national competition.

KW - Exercise performance

KW - Exercise training

KW - Muscle function

KW - Sport

KW - Strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57749169061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.3.2.176

DO - 10.1123/ijspp.3.2.176

M3 - Article

C2 - 19208926

AN - SCOPUS:57749169061

VL - 3

SP - 176

EP - 184

JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

SN - 1555-0265

IS - 2

ER -