Research Gaps in Wilderness Medicine

Daniel Tritz, Kody Dormire, Travis Brachtenbach, Joshua Gordon, Donald Sanders, David Gearheart, Julia Crawford, Matt Vassar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Wilderness medicine involves the treatment of individuals in remote, austere environments. Given the high potential for injuries as well as the unique treatment modalities required in wilderness medicine, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are necessary to provide optimal care. In this study, we identify evidence gaps from low-quality recommendations in wilderness medicine clinical practice guidelines and identify new/ongoing research addressing them. Methods: We included relevant clinical practice guidelines from the Wilderness Medical Society and obtained all 1C or 2C level recommendations. Patient/Problem/Population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were created to address each recommendation. Using 24 search strings, we extracted titles, clinical trial registry number, and recruitment status for 8899 articles. We categorized the articles by trial design to infer the effect they may have on future recommendations. Results: Twelve clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria. From these we located 275 low-quality recommendations and used them to create 275 PICO questions. Thirty-three articles were relevant to the PICO questions. Heat-related illness had the highest number of relevant articles (n=9), but acute pain and altitude sickness had the most randomized clinical trials (n=6). Conclusion: Overall, few studies were being conducted to address research gaps in wilderness medicine. Heat-related illness had the most new or ongoing research, whereas no studies were being conducted to address gaps in eye injuries, basic wound management, or spine immobilization. Animals, cadavers, and mannequin research are useful in cases in which human evidence is difficult to obtain. Establishing research priorities is recommended for addressing research gaps identified by guideline panels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-303
Number of pages13
JournalWilderness and Environmental Medicine
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Wilderness Medicine
Practice Guidelines
Research
Wilderness
Hot Temperature
Altitude Sickness
Population
Manikins
Eye Injuries
Evidence-Based Practice
Medical Societies
Wounds and Injuries
Acute Pain
Cadaver
Immobilization
Registries
Spine
Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Trials
Guidelines

Keywords

  • evidence-based emergency medicine
  • immobilization
  • injuries
  • practice guideline
  • snakebites
  • wound

Cite this

@article{a8ac594424c142d3ac3a25d9e967c5ee,
title = "Research Gaps in Wilderness Medicine",
abstract = "Introduction: Wilderness medicine involves the treatment of individuals in remote, austere environments. Given the high potential for injuries as well as the unique treatment modalities required in wilderness medicine, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are necessary to provide optimal care. In this study, we identify evidence gaps from low-quality recommendations in wilderness medicine clinical practice guidelines and identify new/ongoing research addressing them. Methods: We included relevant clinical practice guidelines from the Wilderness Medical Society and obtained all 1C or 2C level recommendations. Patient/Problem/Population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were created to address each recommendation. Using 24 search strings, we extracted titles, clinical trial registry number, and recruitment status for 8899 articles. We categorized the articles by trial design to infer the effect they may have on future recommendations. Results: Twelve clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria. From these we located 275 low-quality recommendations and used them to create 275 PICO questions. Thirty-three articles were relevant to the PICO questions. Heat-related illness had the highest number of relevant articles (n=9), but acute pain and altitude sickness had the most randomized clinical trials (n=6). Conclusion: Overall, few studies were being conducted to address research gaps in wilderness medicine. Heat-related illness had the most new or ongoing research, whereas no studies were being conducted to address gaps in eye injuries, basic wound management, or spine immobilization. Animals, cadavers, and mannequin research are useful in cases in which human evidence is difficult to obtain. Establishing research priorities is recommended for addressing research gaps identified by guideline panels.",
keywords = "evidence-based emergency medicine, immobilization, injuries, practice guideline, snakebites, wound",
author = "Daniel Tritz and Kody Dormire and Travis Brachtenbach and Joshua Gordon and Donald Sanders and David Gearheart and Julia Crawford and Matt Vassar",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.wem.2018.02.008",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "291--303",
journal = "Wilderness and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1080-6032",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Research Gaps in Wilderness Medicine. / Tritz, Daniel; Dormire, Kody; Brachtenbach, Travis; Gordon, Joshua; Sanders, Donald; Gearheart, David; Crawford, Julia; Vassar, Matt.

In: Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 291-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Gaps in Wilderness Medicine

AU - Tritz, Daniel

AU - Dormire, Kody

AU - Brachtenbach, Travis

AU - Gordon, Joshua

AU - Sanders, Donald

AU - Gearheart, David

AU - Crawford, Julia

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Introduction: Wilderness medicine involves the treatment of individuals in remote, austere environments. Given the high potential for injuries as well as the unique treatment modalities required in wilderness medicine, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are necessary to provide optimal care. In this study, we identify evidence gaps from low-quality recommendations in wilderness medicine clinical practice guidelines and identify new/ongoing research addressing them. Methods: We included relevant clinical practice guidelines from the Wilderness Medical Society and obtained all 1C or 2C level recommendations. Patient/Problem/Population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were created to address each recommendation. Using 24 search strings, we extracted titles, clinical trial registry number, and recruitment status for 8899 articles. We categorized the articles by trial design to infer the effect they may have on future recommendations. Results: Twelve clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria. From these we located 275 low-quality recommendations and used them to create 275 PICO questions. Thirty-three articles were relevant to the PICO questions. Heat-related illness had the highest number of relevant articles (n=9), but acute pain and altitude sickness had the most randomized clinical trials (n=6). Conclusion: Overall, few studies were being conducted to address research gaps in wilderness medicine. Heat-related illness had the most new or ongoing research, whereas no studies were being conducted to address gaps in eye injuries, basic wound management, or spine immobilization. Animals, cadavers, and mannequin research are useful in cases in which human evidence is difficult to obtain. Establishing research priorities is recommended for addressing research gaps identified by guideline panels.

AB - Introduction: Wilderness medicine involves the treatment of individuals in remote, austere environments. Given the high potential for injuries as well as the unique treatment modalities required in wilderness medicine, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are necessary to provide optimal care. In this study, we identify evidence gaps from low-quality recommendations in wilderness medicine clinical practice guidelines and identify new/ongoing research addressing them. Methods: We included relevant clinical practice guidelines from the Wilderness Medical Society and obtained all 1C or 2C level recommendations. Patient/Problem/Population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were created to address each recommendation. Using 24 search strings, we extracted titles, clinical trial registry number, and recruitment status for 8899 articles. We categorized the articles by trial design to infer the effect they may have on future recommendations. Results: Twelve clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria. From these we located 275 low-quality recommendations and used them to create 275 PICO questions. Thirty-three articles were relevant to the PICO questions. Heat-related illness had the highest number of relevant articles (n=9), but acute pain and altitude sickness had the most randomized clinical trials (n=6). Conclusion: Overall, few studies were being conducted to address research gaps in wilderness medicine. Heat-related illness had the most new or ongoing research, whereas no studies were being conducted to address gaps in eye injuries, basic wound management, or spine immobilization. Animals, cadavers, and mannequin research are useful in cases in which human evidence is difficult to obtain. Establishing research priorities is recommended for addressing research gaps identified by guideline panels.

KW - evidence-based emergency medicine

KW - immobilization

KW - injuries

KW - practice guideline

KW - snakebites

KW - wound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047226453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wem.2018.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.wem.2018.02.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 29784570

AN - SCOPUS:85047226453

VL - 29

SP - 291

EP - 303

JO - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

JF - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1080-6032

IS - 3

ER -