Reliability reporting across studies using the buss durkee hostility inventory

Matt Vassar, William Hale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Empirical research on anger and hostility has pervaded the academic literature for more than 50 years. Accurate measurement of anger/hostility and subsequent interpretation of results requires that the instruments yield strong psychometric properties. For consistent measurement, reliability estimates must be calculated with each administration, because changes in sample characteristics may alter the scale's ability to generate reliable scores. Therefore, the present study was designed to address reliability reporting practices for a widely used anger assessment, the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Of the 250 published articles reviewed, 11.2% calculated and presented reliability estimates for the data at hand, 6.8% cited estimates from a previous study, and 77.1% made no mention of score reliability. Mean alpha estimates of scores for BDHI subscales generally fell below acceptable standards. Additionally, no detectable pattern was found between reporting practices and publication year or journal prestige. Areas for future research are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-37
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2009

Keywords

  • BDHI
  • Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory
  • Psychometric
  • Reliability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability reporting across studies using the buss durkee hostility inventory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this