Predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written examinations

Thomas A. Cavalieri, Linjun Shen, Gary L. Slick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written medical examinations. Performances on the three osteopathic initial licensing examinations, the three osteopathic internal medicine in-service examinations, and the osteopathic internal medicine board certification examinations were analyzed for a cohort of the most recent osteopathic internal medicine board certification examination candidates (N = 82). Multiple regressions were performed for the predictive value of licensing examination scores for the late examination scores. Logistic regressions were used for the prediction of pass/fail status on the licensing examinations for that on the board certification. A longitudinal performance profile was constructed to assess the rank changes in decile on the examinations at different times. All correlation coefficients between the licensing examinations and other examinations were significant and higher than .70. The licensing examinations together predicted at least 60% of the variance of any of the other examination scores. The pass/fail status on the licensing examinations predicted 89% of the pass/fail status on the certification examination. Decile ranks since the first licensing examination were consistent and stable over at least 5 years. The osteopathic licensing examinations had high predictive validity for the late written osteopathic internal medicine examinations. Generalization of the findings to other disciplines needs a caution, as a specialty bias may exist for these types of studies.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)337-342
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
    Volume103
    Issue number7
    StatePublished - 1 Jul 2003

    Fingerprint

    Licensure
    Osteopathic Medicine
    Certification
    Internal Medicine
    Logistic Models

    Cite this

    @article{fdf90e80e521453984cf249a7edd7e74,
    title = "Predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written examinations",
    abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written medical examinations. Performances on the three osteopathic initial licensing examinations, the three osteopathic internal medicine in-service examinations, and the osteopathic internal medicine board certification examinations were analyzed for a cohort of the most recent osteopathic internal medicine board certification examination candidates (N = 82). Multiple regressions were performed for the predictive value of licensing examination scores for the late examination scores. Logistic regressions were used for the prediction of pass/fail status on the licensing examinations for that on the board certification. A longitudinal performance profile was constructed to assess the rank changes in decile on the examinations at different times. All correlation coefficients between the licensing examinations and other examinations were significant and higher than .70. The licensing examinations together predicted at least 60{\%} of the variance of any of the other examination scores. The pass/fail status on the licensing examinations predicted 89{\%} of the pass/fail status on the certification examination. Decile ranks since the first licensing examination were consistent and stable over at least 5 years. The osteopathic licensing examinations had high predictive validity for the late written osteopathic internal medicine examinations. Generalization of the findings to other disciplines needs a caution, as a specialty bias may exist for these types of studies.",
    author = "Cavalieri, {Thomas A.} and Linjun Shen and Slick, {Gary L.}",
    year = "2003",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "103",
    pages = "337--342",
    journal = "Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
    issn = "0098-6151",
    publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written examinations

    AU - Cavalieri, Thomas A.

    AU - Shen, Linjun

    AU - Slick, Gary L.

    PY - 2003/7/1

    Y1 - 2003/7/1

    N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written medical examinations. Performances on the three osteopathic initial licensing examinations, the three osteopathic internal medicine in-service examinations, and the osteopathic internal medicine board certification examinations were analyzed for a cohort of the most recent osteopathic internal medicine board certification examination candidates (N = 82). Multiple regressions were performed for the predictive value of licensing examination scores for the late examination scores. Logistic regressions were used for the prediction of pass/fail status on the licensing examinations for that on the board certification. A longitudinal performance profile was constructed to assess the rank changes in decile on the examinations at different times. All correlation coefficients between the licensing examinations and other examinations were significant and higher than .70. The licensing examinations together predicted at least 60% of the variance of any of the other examination scores. The pass/fail status on the licensing examinations predicted 89% of the pass/fail status on the certification examination. Decile ranks since the first licensing examination were consistent and stable over at least 5 years. The osteopathic licensing examinations had high predictive validity for the late written osteopathic internal medicine examinations. Generalization of the findings to other disciplines needs a caution, as a specialty bias may exist for these types of studies.

    AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of osteopathic medical licensing examinations for osteopathic medical knowledge measured by graduate written medical examinations. Performances on the three osteopathic initial licensing examinations, the three osteopathic internal medicine in-service examinations, and the osteopathic internal medicine board certification examinations were analyzed for a cohort of the most recent osteopathic internal medicine board certification examination candidates (N = 82). Multiple regressions were performed for the predictive value of licensing examination scores for the late examination scores. Logistic regressions were used for the prediction of pass/fail status on the licensing examinations for that on the board certification. A longitudinal performance profile was constructed to assess the rank changes in decile on the examinations at different times. All correlation coefficients between the licensing examinations and other examinations were significant and higher than .70. The licensing examinations together predicted at least 60% of the variance of any of the other examination scores. The pass/fail status on the licensing examinations predicted 89% of the pass/fail status on the certification examination. Decile ranks since the first licensing examination were consistent and stable over at least 5 years. The osteopathic licensing examinations had high predictive validity for the late written osteopathic internal medicine examinations. Generalization of the findings to other disciplines needs a caution, as a specialty bias may exist for these types of studies.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038443108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 12884946

    AN - SCOPUS:0038443108

    VL - 103

    SP - 337

    EP - 342

    JO - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

    JF - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

    SN - 0098-6151

    IS - 7

    ER -