Performances of candidates with osteopathic compared with allopathic subspecialty training on the american osteopathic board of internal medicine subspecialty certifying examinations 1984 to 1992

Gary Slick, S. Dolan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The American Osteopathic Board of Internal Medicine has been examining various factors that may affect candidate performance on subspecialty certifying examinations. To see whether taking subspecialty training in an osteopathic compared with an allopathic institution could predict better performance on the certifying examinations, the authors analyzed examination performance for all candidates from 1984 through 1992. There was no significant difference between the mean scores for the two groups for any of the nine subspecialty certifying examinations. When the results from all nine examinations were pooled, the mean first-time examination takers' score for candidates in allopathic subspecialty programs (n=201) was 78.3 and for those in osteopathic sub-specialty programs (n = 153), 77.4 (P>0.2). On the basis of these results, we cannot conclude that osteopathic subspecialty training is a factor that predicts better performance on the subspecialty certifying examination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1050-1053
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume94
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1994

Fingerprint

Internal Medicine

Cite this

@article{43604076a7b845deb9a6640f82822b99,
title = "Performances of candidates with osteopathic compared with allopathic subspecialty training on the american osteopathic board of internal medicine subspecialty certifying examinations 1984 to 1992",
abstract = "The American Osteopathic Board of Internal Medicine has been examining various factors that may affect candidate performance on subspecialty certifying examinations. To see whether taking subspecialty training in an osteopathic compared with an allopathic institution could predict better performance on the certifying examinations, the authors analyzed examination performance for all candidates from 1984 through 1992. There was no significant difference between the mean scores for the two groups for any of the nine subspecialty certifying examinations. When the results from all nine examinations were pooled, the mean first-time examination takers' score for candidates in allopathic subspecialty programs (n=201) was 78.3 and for those in osteopathic sub-specialty programs (n = 153), 77.4 (P>0.2). On the basis of these results, we cannot conclude that osteopathic subspecialty training is a factor that predicts better performance on the subspecialty certifying examination.",
author = "Gary Slick and S. Dolan",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "1050--1053",
journal = "Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
issn = "0098-6151",
publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performances of candidates with osteopathic compared with allopathic subspecialty training on the american osteopathic board of internal medicine subspecialty certifying examinations 1984 to 1992

AU - Slick, Gary

AU - Dolan, S.

PY - 1994/12/1

Y1 - 1994/12/1

N2 - The American Osteopathic Board of Internal Medicine has been examining various factors that may affect candidate performance on subspecialty certifying examinations. To see whether taking subspecialty training in an osteopathic compared with an allopathic institution could predict better performance on the certifying examinations, the authors analyzed examination performance for all candidates from 1984 through 1992. There was no significant difference between the mean scores for the two groups for any of the nine subspecialty certifying examinations. When the results from all nine examinations were pooled, the mean first-time examination takers' score for candidates in allopathic subspecialty programs (n=201) was 78.3 and for those in osteopathic sub-specialty programs (n = 153), 77.4 (P>0.2). On the basis of these results, we cannot conclude that osteopathic subspecialty training is a factor that predicts better performance on the subspecialty certifying examination.

AB - The American Osteopathic Board of Internal Medicine has been examining various factors that may affect candidate performance on subspecialty certifying examinations. To see whether taking subspecialty training in an osteopathic compared with an allopathic institution could predict better performance on the certifying examinations, the authors analyzed examination performance for all candidates from 1984 through 1992. There was no significant difference between the mean scores for the two groups for any of the nine subspecialty certifying examinations. When the results from all nine examinations were pooled, the mean first-time examination takers' score for candidates in allopathic subspecialty programs (n=201) was 78.3 and for those in osteopathic sub-specialty programs (n = 153), 77.4 (P>0.2). On the basis of these results, we cannot conclude that osteopathic subspecialty training is a factor that predicts better performance on the subspecialty certifying examination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028577523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7852104

AN - SCOPUS:0028577523

VL - 94

SP - 1050

EP - 1053

JO - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

JF - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

SN - 0098-6151

IS - 12

ER -