TY - JOUR
T1 - Pavlovian conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex in harnessed foragers using paired vs. unpaired and discrimination learning paradigms
T2 - Tests for differences among honeybee subspecies in Turkey
AU - Abramson, Charles I.
AU - Andrew Mixson, T.
AU - Çakmak, Ibrahim
AU - Place, Aaron J.
AU - Wells, Harrington
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - Experiments utilized three honeybee subspecies from very distinct biomes (Apis mellifera caucasica, A.m. carnica, A.m. syriaca). In experiment one a simple association between odor and a sucrose feeding was readily established in all three subspecies. This association decreased when the conditioned stimulus was no longer followed by a feeding. Neither the learning rate nor extinction rate differed among subspecies. Unpaired controls confirmed that the acquisition of the odor-food association is learned. In experiment two, an attempt to uncover subspecies differences was tested through the ability of bees to discriminate between two odors, one of which is paired with a feeding. Rapid learning occurred in all subspecies and no significant subspecies differences were observed. Finally, discrimination learning was used as an added control to test for honeybee response to an olfactory versus mechanical (air) stimulus.
AB - Experiments utilized three honeybee subspecies from very distinct biomes (Apis mellifera caucasica, A.m. carnica, A.m. syriaca). In experiment one a simple association between odor and a sucrose feeding was readily established in all three subspecies. This association decreased when the conditioned stimulus was no longer followed by a feeding. Neither the learning rate nor extinction rate differed among subspecies. Unpaired controls confirmed that the acquisition of the odor-food association is learned. In experiment two, an attempt to uncover subspecies differences was tested through the ability of bees to discriminate between two odors, one of which is paired with a feeding. Rapid learning occurred in all subspecies and no significant subspecies differences were observed. Finally, discrimination learning was used as an added control to test for honeybee response to an olfactory versus mechanical (air) stimulus.
KW - Apis mellifera carnica
KW - Apis mellifera caucasica
KW - Apis mellifera syriaca
KW - Discrimination learning
KW - Proboscis conditioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52649152948&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/apido:2008025
DO - 10.1051/apido:2008025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:52649152948
SN - 0044-8435
VL - 39
SP - 428
EP - 435
JO - Apidologie
JF - Apidologie
IS - 4
ER -