TY - JOUR
T1 - Pain management following total shoulder arthroplasty
T2 - what are patients reading online?
AU - Martinez, Victor H.
AU - Allen, Christian B.
AU - Zaheer, Aroob
AU - Jonas, Margaret E.
AU - Williamson, Tyler K.
AU - Checketts, Jake X.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Background: This study aims to assess the quality and readability of online resources regarding postoperative pain control for patients having undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), along with identifying gaps among the types of information. Methods: Three search engines were used to conduct internet searches utilizing a combination of TSA and pain management search phrases. The top 20 web pages from each search engine were gathered, reviewed, and scored by five different evaluators. Scoring was performed using 30-point criteria, integrated into an overall quality of resource (QR) score considered significant for patient education about TSA and pain management according to American Pain Society and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons’ published recommendations (Table I). Domain scores (route of administration, type of analgesia, opioid-specific, and general guidance) were calculated by summing the total points and dividing by the total possible score for each domain. The reading level of the Flesch-Kinkaid grade level, the Flesch reading ease, and the simple measure of gobbledygook index was also assessed. Results: The overall readability was low, with a mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level score of 10.3 ± 2.0 and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook score of 9.9 ± 1.5. According to this index, only one website (2.3%) was written below the suggested 6th grade reading level. There was a mean QR score of 9.6/30 points, ranging from 2 to 22 (Table II). Most resources (90.9%) did not achieve greater than 50% of the total available points (greater than 15 out of 30). Of the domains, the mean score for route of administration was 31.8%, types of analgesia was 43.6%, opioid-specific was 11.4%, and general guidance was 43.2%. Opioid-specific scores were lower than all three other domain scores (all P < .001). Conclusion: According to our findings, current online resources for pain management following TSA are written above the average literacy level for adults in the United States and lack educational content, especially regarding opioid-specific discussion and recommendations. Resources must target gaps in online patient education to better inform patients of postoperative pain control, convey expectations, and encourage patient-physician conversations and decision-making.
AB - Background: This study aims to assess the quality and readability of online resources regarding postoperative pain control for patients having undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), along with identifying gaps among the types of information. Methods: Three search engines were used to conduct internet searches utilizing a combination of TSA and pain management search phrases. The top 20 web pages from each search engine were gathered, reviewed, and scored by five different evaluators. Scoring was performed using 30-point criteria, integrated into an overall quality of resource (QR) score considered significant for patient education about TSA and pain management according to American Pain Society and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons’ published recommendations (Table I). Domain scores (route of administration, type of analgesia, opioid-specific, and general guidance) were calculated by summing the total points and dividing by the total possible score for each domain. The reading level of the Flesch-Kinkaid grade level, the Flesch reading ease, and the simple measure of gobbledygook index was also assessed. Results: The overall readability was low, with a mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level score of 10.3 ± 2.0 and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook score of 9.9 ± 1.5. According to this index, only one website (2.3%) was written below the suggested 6th grade reading level. There was a mean QR score of 9.6/30 points, ranging from 2 to 22 (Table II). Most resources (90.9%) did not achieve greater than 50% of the total available points (greater than 15 out of 30). Of the domains, the mean score for route of administration was 31.8%, types of analgesia was 43.6%, opioid-specific was 11.4%, and general guidance was 43.2%. Opioid-specific scores were lower than all three other domain scores (all P < .001). Conclusion: According to our findings, current online resources for pain management following TSA are written above the average literacy level for adults in the United States and lack educational content, especially regarding opioid-specific discussion and recommendations. Resources must target gaps in online patient education to better inform patients of postoperative pain control, convey expectations, and encourage patient-physician conversations and decision-making.
KW - Level V
KW - Literature Review
KW - Online resources
KW - Opioids
KW - Pain management
KW - Quality content
KW - Readability
KW - Shoulder replacement
KW - Total shoulder arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161637102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.sart.2023.04.012
DO - 10.1053/j.sart.2023.04.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161637102
SN - 1045-4527
VL - 33
SP - 561
EP - 566
JO - Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES
JF - Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES
IS - 3
ER -