Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates: Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale

Gail A. Williams, Misty A.W. Hawkins, Jennifer Duncan, Christina M. Rummell, Shannon Perkins, Janis H. Crowther

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Eating pathology among bariatric surgery candidates is common and associated with adverse outcomes. However, its assessment is complicated by the inconsistent use of standardized measures. We addressed this by examining the use of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS) in a large bariatric sample (N = 343). Objectives To evaluate the EDDS among bariatric surgery candidates via examination of: (1) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) and fifth edition (DSM-5) rates of binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and maladaptive eating behaviors, and (2) the relationship between response biases and self-reported eating disorder symptoms. Setting Participants were bariatric surgery candidates at a large public hospital in the Midwest. Methods As part of a larger preoperative evaluation, 343 patients seeking bariatric surgery completed the EDDS and measures of problematic response bias. Results Approximately 16% of the sample met full threshold criteria for binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Using the DSM-IV-TR, rates were lower but still substantial at 13%. Rates for bulimia nervosa were 8% (DSM-5) and 6% (DSM-IV-TR). The majority (66.1%) of participants reported at least one binge-eating episode per week. The most commonly used compensatory behavior was fasting (20.4%), followed by excessive exercise (11.7%), laxative use (5.6%), and vomiting (1.8%). An inverse relationship between severity of the eating symptomatology and problematic response bias emerged. Conclusion The EDDS shows promise as a screening tool that uses diagnostic criteria to provide rates of binge eating and eating psychopathology among surgical candidates. Our findings suggest that subsequent validation studies of this measure are needed, should address potential response bias concerns, and should employ clear definitions of binge eating to promote standardization of eating pathology assessment in the bariatric population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1183-1188
Number of pages6
JournalSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bariatric Surgery
Feeding Behavior
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Bulimia
Eating
Binge-Eating Disorder
Bariatrics
Bulimia Nervosa
Pathology
Laxatives
Validation Studies
Public Hospitals
Psychopathology
Vomiting
Fasting
Feeding and Eating Disorders
Exercise
Population

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Binge eating
  • Eating disorder
  • Preoperative assessment
  • Purging

Cite this

Williams, Gail A. ; Hawkins, Misty A.W. ; Duncan, Jennifer ; Rummell, Christina M. ; Perkins, Shannon ; Crowther, Janis H. / Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates : Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale. In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2017 ; Vol. 13, No. 7. pp. 1183-1188.
@article{79cf4477397741759542a0a4f5474c09,
title = "Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates: Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale",
abstract = "Background Eating pathology among bariatric surgery candidates is common and associated with adverse outcomes. However, its assessment is complicated by the inconsistent use of standardized measures. We addressed this by examining the use of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS) in a large bariatric sample (N = 343). Objectives To evaluate the EDDS among bariatric surgery candidates via examination of: (1) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) and fifth edition (DSM-5) rates of binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and maladaptive eating behaviors, and (2) the relationship between response biases and self-reported eating disorder symptoms. Setting Participants were bariatric surgery candidates at a large public hospital in the Midwest. Methods As part of a larger preoperative evaluation, 343 patients seeking bariatric surgery completed the EDDS and measures of problematic response bias. Results Approximately 16{\%} of the sample met full threshold criteria for binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Using the DSM-IV-TR, rates were lower but still substantial at 13{\%}. Rates for bulimia nervosa were 8{\%} (DSM-5) and 6{\%} (DSM-IV-TR). The majority (66.1{\%}) of participants reported at least one binge-eating episode per week. The most commonly used compensatory behavior was fasting (20.4{\%}), followed by excessive exercise (11.7{\%}), laxative use (5.6{\%}), and vomiting (1.8{\%}). An inverse relationship between severity of the eating symptomatology and problematic response bias emerged. Conclusion The EDDS shows promise as a screening tool that uses diagnostic criteria to provide rates of binge eating and eating psychopathology among surgical candidates. Our findings suggest that subsequent validation studies of this measure are needed, should address potential response bias concerns, and should employ clear definitions of binge eating to promote standardization of eating pathology assessment in the bariatric population.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Binge eating, Eating disorder, Preoperative assessment, Purging",
author = "Williams, {Gail A.} and Hawkins, {Misty A.W.} and Jennifer Duncan and Rummell, {Christina M.} and Shannon Perkins and Crowther, {Janis H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1183--1188",
journal = "Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases",
issn = "1550-7289",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates : Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale. / Williams, Gail A.; Hawkins, Misty A.W.; Duncan, Jennifer; Rummell, Christina M.; Perkins, Shannon; Crowther, Janis H.

In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Vol. 13, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 1183-1188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates

T2 - Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale

AU - Williams, Gail A.

AU - Hawkins, Misty A.W.

AU - Duncan, Jennifer

AU - Rummell, Christina M.

AU - Perkins, Shannon

AU - Crowther, Janis H.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background Eating pathology among bariatric surgery candidates is common and associated with adverse outcomes. However, its assessment is complicated by the inconsistent use of standardized measures. We addressed this by examining the use of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS) in a large bariatric sample (N = 343). Objectives To evaluate the EDDS among bariatric surgery candidates via examination of: (1) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) and fifth edition (DSM-5) rates of binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and maladaptive eating behaviors, and (2) the relationship between response biases and self-reported eating disorder symptoms. Setting Participants were bariatric surgery candidates at a large public hospital in the Midwest. Methods As part of a larger preoperative evaluation, 343 patients seeking bariatric surgery completed the EDDS and measures of problematic response bias. Results Approximately 16% of the sample met full threshold criteria for binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Using the DSM-IV-TR, rates were lower but still substantial at 13%. Rates for bulimia nervosa were 8% (DSM-5) and 6% (DSM-IV-TR). The majority (66.1%) of participants reported at least one binge-eating episode per week. The most commonly used compensatory behavior was fasting (20.4%), followed by excessive exercise (11.7%), laxative use (5.6%), and vomiting (1.8%). An inverse relationship between severity of the eating symptomatology and problematic response bias emerged. Conclusion The EDDS shows promise as a screening tool that uses diagnostic criteria to provide rates of binge eating and eating psychopathology among surgical candidates. Our findings suggest that subsequent validation studies of this measure are needed, should address potential response bias concerns, and should employ clear definitions of binge eating to promote standardization of eating pathology assessment in the bariatric population.

AB - Background Eating pathology among bariatric surgery candidates is common and associated with adverse outcomes. However, its assessment is complicated by the inconsistent use of standardized measures. We addressed this by examining the use of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS) in a large bariatric sample (N = 343). Objectives To evaluate the EDDS among bariatric surgery candidates via examination of: (1) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) and fifth edition (DSM-5) rates of binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and maladaptive eating behaviors, and (2) the relationship between response biases and self-reported eating disorder symptoms. Setting Participants were bariatric surgery candidates at a large public hospital in the Midwest. Methods As part of a larger preoperative evaluation, 343 patients seeking bariatric surgery completed the EDDS and measures of problematic response bias. Results Approximately 16% of the sample met full threshold criteria for binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Using the DSM-IV-TR, rates were lower but still substantial at 13%. Rates for bulimia nervosa were 8% (DSM-5) and 6% (DSM-IV-TR). The majority (66.1%) of participants reported at least one binge-eating episode per week. The most commonly used compensatory behavior was fasting (20.4%), followed by excessive exercise (11.7%), laxative use (5.6%), and vomiting (1.8%). An inverse relationship between severity of the eating symptomatology and problematic response bias emerged. Conclusion The EDDS shows promise as a screening tool that uses diagnostic criteria to provide rates of binge eating and eating psychopathology among surgical candidates. Our findings suggest that subsequent validation studies of this measure are needed, should address potential response bias concerns, and should employ clear definitions of binge eating to promote standardization of eating pathology assessment in the bariatric population.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Binge eating

KW - Eating disorder

KW - Preoperative assessment

KW - Purging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018251036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 28461035

AN - SCOPUS:85018251036

VL - 13

SP - 1183

EP - 1188

JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

SN - 1550-7289

IS - 7

ER -