TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent variables for region of interest activation during the monetary incentive delay task
AU - T1000 Investigators
AU - White, Evan J.
AU - Kuplicki, Rayus
AU - Stewart, Jennifer L.
AU - Kirlic, Namik
AU - Yeh, Hung Wen
AU - Paulus, Martin P.
AU - Aupperle, Robin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been supported in part by The William K. Warren Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health ( K23MH112949 (SSK), K23MH108707 (RLA)), and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Center Grant Award Number 1P20GM121312 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
This work has been supported in part by The William K. Warren Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH112949 (SSK), K23MH108707 (RLA)), and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Center Grant Award Number 1P20GM121312. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for the clinical protocol associated with data published in the current paper is NCT02450240, ?Latent Structure of Multi-level Assessments and Predictors of Outcomes in Psychiatric Disorders?. The Tulsa 1000 Investigators include the following contributors: Jerzy Bodurka, Ph.D. Yoon-Hee Cha, M.D. Justin Feinstein, Ph.D. Sahib S. Khalsa, M.D. Ph.D. Jonathan Savitz, Ph.D. Teresa A. Victor, Ph.D.
Funding Information:
Evan J. White Ph.D.; Rayus Kuplicki, Ph.D. Jennifer L. Stewart, Ph.D., Namik Kirlic, Ph.D., Justin Feinstein, Ph.D., Jonathan Savitz, Ph.D., Robin Aupperle Ph.D., and Martin Paulus M.D. receive funding from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) center grant P20GM121312; Sahib Kahlsa M.D. Ph.D. has grant funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; K23MH112949); Robin Aupperle Ph.D. has additional grant funding from NIMH (K23MH108707; R01MH123691); and Martin Paulus, M.D. has additional grant funding from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (U01DA041089) and Dr. Paulus is an advisor to Spring Care, Inc., a behavioral health startup, he has received royalties for an article about methamphetamine in UpToDate; Hung-Wen Yeh, Ph.D. has no financial disclosures to report Jerzy Bodurka Ph.D. has no financial disclosures to report; Yoon-Hee Cha, M.D. has no financial disclosures to report. Teresa Victor, Ph.D. has no financial disclosures to report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/4/15
Y1 - 2021/4/15
N2 - Background: The Monetary Incentive Delay task (MID) has been used extensively to probe anticipatory reward processes. However, individual differences evident during this task may relate to other constructs such as general arousal or valence processing (i.e., anticipation of negative versus positive outcomes). This investigation used a latent variable approach to parse activation patterns during the MID within a transdiagnostic clinical sample. Methods: Participants were drawn from the first 500 individuals recruited for the Tulsa-1000 (T1000), a naturalistic longitudinal study of 1000 participants aged 18–55 (n = 476 with MID data). We employed a multiview latent analysis method, group factor analysis, to characterize factors within and across variable sets consisting of: (1) region of interest (ROI)-based blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrasts during reward and loss anticipation; and (2) self-report measures of positive and negative valence and related constructs. Results: Three factors comprised of ROI indicators emerged to accounted for >43% of variance and loaded on variables representing: (1) general arousal or general activation; (2) valence, with dissociable responses to anticipation of win versus loss; and (3) region-specific activation, with dissociable activation in salience versus perceptual brain networks. Two additional factors were comprised of self-report variables, which appeared to represent arousal and valence. Conclusions: Results indicate that multiview techniques to identify latent variables offer a novel approach for differentiating brain activation patterns during task engagement. Such approaches may offer insight into neural processing patterns through dimension reduction, be useful for probing individual differences, and aid in the development of optimal explanatory or predictive frameworks.
AB - Background: The Monetary Incentive Delay task (MID) has been used extensively to probe anticipatory reward processes. However, individual differences evident during this task may relate to other constructs such as general arousal or valence processing (i.e., anticipation of negative versus positive outcomes). This investigation used a latent variable approach to parse activation patterns during the MID within a transdiagnostic clinical sample. Methods: Participants were drawn from the first 500 individuals recruited for the Tulsa-1000 (T1000), a naturalistic longitudinal study of 1000 participants aged 18–55 (n = 476 with MID data). We employed a multiview latent analysis method, group factor analysis, to characterize factors within and across variable sets consisting of: (1) region of interest (ROI)-based blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrasts during reward and loss anticipation; and (2) self-report measures of positive and negative valence and related constructs. Results: Three factors comprised of ROI indicators emerged to accounted for >43% of variance and loaded on variables representing: (1) general arousal or general activation; (2) valence, with dissociable responses to anticipation of win versus loss; and (3) region-specific activation, with dissociable activation in salience versus perceptual brain networks. Two additional factors were comprised of self-report variables, which appeared to represent arousal and valence. Conclusions: Results indicate that multiview techniques to identify latent variables offer a novel approach for differentiating brain activation patterns during task engagement. Such approaches may offer insight into neural processing patterns through dimension reduction, be useful for probing individual differences, and aid in the development of optimal explanatory or predictive frameworks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100093822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117796
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117796
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100093822
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 230
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
M1 - 117796
ER -