TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Statewide Statute Limiting Days’ Supply to Opioid-Naive Patients
AU - Sullivan, Katherine J.
AU - Gabella, Barbara
AU - Ziegler, Katherine
AU - Tolle, Heather
AU - Giano, Zachary
AU - Hoppe, Jason
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Award Number 2018-PM-BX-K125 , provided by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice .
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Justin Wipf and Dmitry Kunin with the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies; Ryan Peterson with the University of Colorado School of Public Health; Ian Danielson with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; José Esquibel who is the director of the Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention and associate director of the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus; and Robert Valuck, who is professor of Pharmacy and director of the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus for their invaluable insights regarding this work. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice or the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. This work was supported by Award Number 2018-PM-BX-K125, provided by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper. Katherine J. Sullivan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Project administration Barbara Gabella: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition Katherine Ziegler: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - review & editing Heather Tolle: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Project administration. Zachary Giano: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing Jason Hoppe: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validity, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: To address the ongoing opioid crisis, states use policy enactment to restrict prescribing by licensed healthcare providers and mandate the use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs. There have been mixed results regarding the effectiveness of such state policies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Colorado Senate Bill 18-022, which limits opioid prescriptions to ≤7-day supply among patients without an opioid prescription in the previous year (i.e., are opioid naive). Methods: This is a retrospective interrupted time-series analysis of opioid prescribing to evaluate the weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions consistent with statutory limits for ≤7-day supply among opioid-naive patients before and after enactment using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs data from May 21, 2017 to May 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed in 2021–2022. Results: The weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions ≤7-day supply increased by an average of 0.12% per week (p<0.0001) from 79.7% to 87.4% in the week before enactment. The week after enactment, the average increased by 0.2% (p=0.67). The year after enactment, the average weekly percentage change was 0.07% per week, a 0.05% decrease (p=0.01). Conclusions: Statutory limits on days’ supply among opioid-naive patients had little impact on opioid prescribing in Colorado. Legislating limits on opioid prescribing should be evaluated using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data and considered for deimplementation when not impactful.
AB - Introduction: To address the ongoing opioid crisis, states use policy enactment to restrict prescribing by licensed healthcare providers and mandate the use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs. There have been mixed results regarding the effectiveness of such state policies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Colorado Senate Bill 18-022, which limits opioid prescriptions to ≤7-day supply among patients without an opioid prescription in the previous year (i.e., are opioid naive). Methods: This is a retrospective interrupted time-series analysis of opioid prescribing to evaluate the weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions consistent with statutory limits for ≤7-day supply among opioid-naive patients before and after enactment using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs data from May 21, 2017 to May 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed in 2021–2022. Results: The weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions ≤7-day supply increased by an average of 0.12% per week (p<0.0001) from 79.7% to 87.4% in the week before enactment. The week after enactment, the average increased by 0.2% (p=0.67). The year after enactment, the average weekly percentage change was 0.07% per week, a 0.05% decrease (p=0.01). Conclusions: Statutory limits on days’ supply among opioid-naive patients had little impact on opioid prescribing in Colorado. Legislating limits on opioid prescribing should be evaluated using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data and considered for deimplementation when not impactful.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170266403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.015
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 37604303
AN - SCOPUS:85170266403
SN - 0749-3797
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
ER -