TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Distinct Subgroups of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth for Suicide Risk
T2 - A Latent Profile Analysis
AU - Giano, Zachary
AU - Currin, Joseph M.
AU - Deboy, Kyle
AU - Hubach, Randolph D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify profiles of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth who are at risk for suicidal behavior. Method: Data were collected through the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (N = 2,738). We used latent profile analysis to create identity profiles using variables associated with suicide, including bullying, alcohol use, poor grades, electronics use, and sleep hours. Results: The LPA revealed a 6-class solution. Class 6 represented the highest risk profile with the highest scores in alcohol, bullying, poor grades, electronics use, and the least sleep and were 17 times more likely to attempt suicide compared to class 2 (the lowest-risk class). Classes 1, 3, 4, and 5 had a mixture of both high and low risk mean scores across the variables, with class 3 showing the strongest relationship to suicide (7 times more likely than class 2). Conclusion: Because high-risk classes in our study had multiple factors contributing to associations to suicide, programming aimed at attenuating youth suicide among LGB youth may benefit from addressing multiple issues simultaneously (e.g., substance use and bullying). This would be a departure from more traditional programs for LGB youth which are predicated on one specific risk behavior, such as coping with bullying or substance use separately.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify profiles of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth who are at risk for suicidal behavior. Method: Data were collected through the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (N = 2,738). We used latent profile analysis to create identity profiles using variables associated with suicide, including bullying, alcohol use, poor grades, electronics use, and sleep hours. Results: The LPA revealed a 6-class solution. Class 6 represented the highest risk profile with the highest scores in alcohol, bullying, poor grades, electronics use, and the least sleep and were 17 times more likely to attempt suicide compared to class 2 (the lowest-risk class). Classes 1, 3, 4, and 5 had a mixture of both high and low risk mean scores across the variables, with class 3 showing the strongest relationship to suicide (7 times more likely than class 2). Conclusion: Because high-risk classes in our study had multiple factors contributing to associations to suicide, programming aimed at attenuating youth suicide among LGB youth may benefit from addressing multiple issues simultaneously (e.g., substance use and bullying). This would be a departure from more traditional programs for LGB youth which are predicated on one specific risk behavior, such as coping with bullying or substance use separately.
KW - LGB
KW - Risk
KW - Suicide
KW - Youth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084410866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.031
DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 32402798
AN - SCOPUS:85084410866
SN - 1054-139X
VL - 67
SP - 194
EP - 200
JO - Journal of Adolescent Health
JF - Journal of Adolescent Health
IS - 2
ER -