Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in the United States: A Scoping Review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health inequities have been shown to have negative effects on patient care and the healthcare system. It is important for orthopaedic trauma surgeons and researchers to understand the extent to which patients are affected by these inequities. 

METHODS: We conducted a scoping review as outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We searched PubMed and Ovid Embase for articles relating to orthopaedic trauma surgery and health inequities. 

RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, our final sample consisted of 52 studies. The most frequently evaluated inequities were sex (43 of 52 [82.7]), race/ethnicity (23 of 52 [44.2]), and income status (17 of 52 [32.7]). The least frequently evaluated inequities were lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identity (0 of 52 [0.0]) and occupational status (8 of 52 [15.4]). Other inequities evaluated included rural/under resourced (11 of 52 [21.1]) and educational level (10 of 52 [19.2]). No trend was observed when examining inequities reported by year. 

CONCLUSION: Health inequities exist in orthopaedic trauma literature. Our study highlights multiple inequities in the field that need further investigation. Understanding current inequities and how to best mitigate them could improve patient care and outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E489-E503
JournalThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in the United States: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this