Faculty/staff perceptions of a free campus fitness facility

Theresa C. Brown, Jennifer Volberding, Timothy Baghurst, John Sellers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the reason for faculty and staff (N=657; 35 percent males; Mage=45.20) at a large Southern university, for either using or not using the free fitness facilities on campus. Design/methodology/approach - Participants identified themselves as either current (n=306), former (n=213), or never-users (n=138) of the facilities, and completed an on-line self-report qualitative questionnaire asking them to describe their reasons for using or not using the campus fitness facilities. Findings - Thematic coding revealed that motives fell into three broad categories for all user types: personal (i.e. cost, location, social support), facility-specific (i.e. quality and amount of equipment, class variety, hours of operation), and motivational climate (i.e. feeling valued, welcomed, best effort was emphasized). Current users highlighted positive aspects of each category whereas former and never users described each category as a barrier to their exercise routines. Practical implications - The identified themes offer campus administration specific suggestions to entice more non-users and former-users to exercise in the fitness facilities available on campus. Originality/value - While researchers have considered barriers to exercise in past studies, the barriers identified were not specific to fitness facilities. The current work not only examines individuals' reasons for choosing or not choosing a campus fitness facility for their exercise, but also compares the perspectives of former- and never-users to current-users.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-170
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Workplace Health Management
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Exercise
Climate
Social Support
Self Report
Emotions
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Fitness
Staff
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Health promotion
  • Motivation (psychology)
  • Workplace health
  • Workplace wellness

Cite this

Brown, Theresa C. ; Volberding, Jennifer ; Baghurst, Timothy ; Sellers, John. / Faculty/staff perceptions of a free campus fitness facility. In: International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 156-170.
@article{30eba27f455c43079ffe0fca296c46e4,
title = "Faculty/staff perceptions of a free campus fitness facility",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the reason for faculty and staff (N=657; 35 percent males; Mage=45.20) at a large Southern university, for either using or not using the free fitness facilities on campus. Design/methodology/approach - Participants identified themselves as either current (n=306), former (n=213), or never-users (n=138) of the facilities, and completed an on-line self-report qualitative questionnaire asking them to describe their reasons for using or not using the campus fitness facilities. Findings - Thematic coding revealed that motives fell into three broad categories for all user types: personal (i.e. cost, location, social support), facility-specific (i.e. quality and amount of equipment, class variety, hours of operation), and motivational climate (i.e. feeling valued, welcomed, best effort was emphasized). Current users highlighted positive aspects of each category whereas former and never users described each category as a barrier to their exercise routines. Practical implications - The identified themes offer campus administration specific suggestions to entice more non-users and former-users to exercise in the fitness facilities available on campus. Originality/value - While researchers have considered barriers to exercise in past studies, the barriers identified were not specific to fitness facilities. The current work not only examines individuals' reasons for choosing or not choosing a campus fitness facility for their exercise, but also compares the perspectives of former- and never-users to current-users.",
keywords = "Exercise, Health promotion, Motivation (psychology), Workplace health, Workplace wellness",
author = "Brown, {Theresa C.} and Jennifer Volberding and Timothy Baghurst and John Sellers",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1108/IJWHM-05-2013-0020",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "156--170",
journal = "International Journal of Workplace Health Management",
issn = "1753-8351",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Faculty/staff perceptions of a free campus fitness facility. / Brown, Theresa C.; Volberding, Jennifer; Baghurst, Timothy; Sellers, John.

In: International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 02.09.2014, p. 156-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty/staff perceptions of a free campus fitness facility

AU - Brown, Theresa C.

AU - Volberding, Jennifer

AU - Baghurst, Timothy

AU - Sellers, John

PY - 2014/9/2

Y1 - 2014/9/2

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the reason for faculty and staff (N=657; 35 percent males; Mage=45.20) at a large Southern university, for either using or not using the free fitness facilities on campus. Design/methodology/approach - Participants identified themselves as either current (n=306), former (n=213), or never-users (n=138) of the facilities, and completed an on-line self-report qualitative questionnaire asking them to describe their reasons for using or not using the campus fitness facilities. Findings - Thematic coding revealed that motives fell into three broad categories for all user types: personal (i.e. cost, location, social support), facility-specific (i.e. quality and amount of equipment, class variety, hours of operation), and motivational climate (i.e. feeling valued, welcomed, best effort was emphasized). Current users highlighted positive aspects of each category whereas former and never users described each category as a barrier to their exercise routines. Practical implications - The identified themes offer campus administration specific suggestions to entice more non-users and former-users to exercise in the fitness facilities available on campus. Originality/value - While researchers have considered barriers to exercise in past studies, the barriers identified were not specific to fitness facilities. The current work not only examines individuals' reasons for choosing or not choosing a campus fitness facility for their exercise, but also compares the perspectives of former- and never-users to current-users.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the reason for faculty and staff (N=657; 35 percent males; Mage=45.20) at a large Southern university, for either using or not using the free fitness facilities on campus. Design/methodology/approach - Participants identified themselves as either current (n=306), former (n=213), or never-users (n=138) of the facilities, and completed an on-line self-report qualitative questionnaire asking them to describe their reasons for using or not using the campus fitness facilities. Findings - Thematic coding revealed that motives fell into three broad categories for all user types: personal (i.e. cost, location, social support), facility-specific (i.e. quality and amount of equipment, class variety, hours of operation), and motivational climate (i.e. feeling valued, welcomed, best effort was emphasized). Current users highlighted positive aspects of each category whereas former and never users described each category as a barrier to their exercise routines. Practical implications - The identified themes offer campus administration specific suggestions to entice more non-users and former-users to exercise in the fitness facilities available on campus. Originality/value - While researchers have considered barriers to exercise in past studies, the barriers identified were not specific to fitness facilities. The current work not only examines individuals' reasons for choosing or not choosing a campus fitness facility for their exercise, but also compares the perspectives of former- and never-users to current-users.

KW - Exercise

KW - Health promotion

KW - Motivation (psychology)

KW - Workplace health

KW - Workplace wellness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926633689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJWHM-05-2013-0020

DO - 10.1108/IJWHM-05-2013-0020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926633689

VL - 7

SP - 156

EP - 170

JO - International Journal of Workplace Health Management

JF - International Journal of Workplace Health Management

SN - 1753-8351

IS - 3

ER -