Evaluation of 'spin' in the abstracts and articles of randomized controlled trials in pain literature and general anesthesia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the abstracts and articles of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pain literature and general anesthesia for the evidence of spin. Materials & methods: Following a priori protocol, we used a PubMed search for RCTs from a 2-year period. Data extracted using the Boutron spin definition for criteria. Results: A total of 163 articles were identified as RCTs with clear primary and secondary end points. A total of 33 trials were identified with nonsignificant primary end points. An 18/33 were found to have spin (54.5%). The spin was identified in the results, title and conclusion 12/18, 3/18 and 3/18, respectively. Conclusion: Spin was found in 54% of pain RCTs. With sensitive clinical concerns, such as chronic pain, any misrepresentation of validity could prove to have significant clinical consequences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-28
Number of pages6
JournalPain Management
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Keywords

  • general anesthesia
  • pain
  • pain management
  • randomized control trials
  • spin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of 'spin' in the abstracts and articles of randomized controlled trials in pain literature and general anesthesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this