Ethical problems with infertility treatments: Attitudes and explanations

Karina M. Shreffler, David R. Johnson, Laurie K. Scheuble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although media coverage of infertility treatments has increased markedly over the past decade, there is a dearth of empirical information about public perceptions of the ethics of infertility procedures (e.g. artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, donor eggs, surrogate mothering, and gestational carriers) and about the factors that shape them. Two representative telephone survey samples (930 adults in a Midwestern state, and 580 adult women aged 25-50 in the North Central region) are analyzed to gauge public views on the ethics of infertility treatments and estimate the effects of social structure and exposure on these views. Ethical concerns were viewed as more serious for techniques that could result in a child who may not be biologically related to the woman or her partner than for those yielding a child biologically related to both parents. Social structural factors such as age and education were the strongest predictors of attitudes towards the ethics of infertility treatments. Neither parenthood nor experiencing infertility was related to ethical concerns, although women reporting the use of infertility services had fewer ethical concerns than their counterparts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)731-746
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Science Journal
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infertility
moral philosophy
Ethics
artificial insemination
parenthood
social structure
telephone
parents
Therapeutics
Surrogate Mothers
coverage
Artificial Insemination
Fertilization in Vitro
Telephone
Eggs
education
Parents
Tissue Donors
Education

Keywords

  • ART
  • Assisted reproductive technologies
  • Ethics
  • Infertility

Cite this

Shreffler, Karina M. ; Johnson, David R. ; Scheuble, Laurie K. / Ethical problems with infertility treatments : Attitudes and explanations. In: Social Science Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 731-746.
@article{00d3a9837cb54ae886b01230ffc4b304,
title = "Ethical problems with infertility treatments: Attitudes and explanations",
abstract = "Although media coverage of infertility treatments has increased markedly over the past decade, there is a dearth of empirical information about public perceptions of the ethics of infertility procedures (e.g. artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, donor eggs, surrogate mothering, and gestational carriers) and about the factors that shape them. Two representative telephone survey samples (930 adults in a Midwestern state, and 580 adult women aged 25-50 in the North Central region) are analyzed to gauge public views on the ethics of infertility treatments and estimate the effects of social structure and exposure on these views. Ethical concerns were viewed as more serious for techniques that could result in a child who may not be biologically related to the woman or her partner than for those yielding a child biologically related to both parents. Social structural factors such as age and education were the strongest predictors of attitudes towards the ethics of infertility treatments. Neither parenthood nor experiencing infertility was related to ethical concerns, although women reporting the use of infertility services had fewer ethical concerns than their counterparts.",
keywords = "ART, Assisted reproductive technologies, Ethics, Infertility",
author = "Shreffler, {Karina M.} and Johnson, {David R.} and Scheuble, {Laurie K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "731--746",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Ethical problems with infertility treatments : Attitudes and explanations. / Shreffler, Karina M.; Johnson, David R.; Scheuble, Laurie K.

In: Social Science Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 731-746.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical problems with infertility treatments

T2 - Attitudes and explanations

AU - Shreffler, Karina M.

AU - Johnson, David R.

AU - Scheuble, Laurie K.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Although media coverage of infertility treatments has increased markedly over the past decade, there is a dearth of empirical information about public perceptions of the ethics of infertility procedures (e.g. artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, donor eggs, surrogate mothering, and gestational carriers) and about the factors that shape them. Two representative telephone survey samples (930 adults in a Midwestern state, and 580 adult women aged 25-50 in the North Central region) are analyzed to gauge public views on the ethics of infertility treatments and estimate the effects of social structure and exposure on these views. Ethical concerns were viewed as more serious for techniques that could result in a child who may not be biologically related to the woman or her partner than for those yielding a child biologically related to both parents. Social structural factors such as age and education were the strongest predictors of attitudes towards the ethics of infertility treatments. Neither parenthood nor experiencing infertility was related to ethical concerns, although women reporting the use of infertility services had fewer ethical concerns than their counterparts.

AB - Although media coverage of infertility treatments has increased markedly over the past decade, there is a dearth of empirical information about public perceptions of the ethics of infertility procedures (e.g. artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, donor eggs, surrogate mothering, and gestational carriers) and about the factors that shape them. Two representative telephone survey samples (930 adults in a Midwestern state, and 580 adult women aged 25-50 in the North Central region) are analyzed to gauge public views on the ethics of infertility treatments and estimate the effects of social structure and exposure on these views. Ethical concerns were viewed as more serious for techniques that could result in a child who may not be biologically related to the woman or her partner than for those yielding a child biologically related to both parents. Social structural factors such as age and education were the strongest predictors of attitudes towards the ethics of infertility treatments. Neither parenthood nor experiencing infertility was related to ethical concerns, although women reporting the use of infertility services had fewer ethical concerns than their counterparts.

KW - ART

KW - Assisted reproductive technologies

KW - Ethics

KW - Infertility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957166145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957166145

VL - 47

SP - 731

EP - 746

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 4

ER -