TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Evaluation of oral fluid as a specimen for DUID (Journal of Analytical Toxicology (2017) 41 (517-522) DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkx036)
AU - Veitenheimer, Allison
AU - Wagner, Jarrad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society of Forensic Toxicologists. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Regarding 'Evaluation of Oral Fluid as a Specimen for DUID' by Veitenheimer and Wagner (2017; Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 41, 517-522), five (5) false positives are listed for THC in Table IV, but there should actually be zero (0). Therefore, the Results section (fourth paragraph) should read 'The ELISA showed two FPs for amphetamine, while the DDS®2 showed one FP for cocaine and no FPs for THC'. The authors regret the error.
AB - Regarding 'Evaluation of Oral Fluid as a Specimen for DUID' by Veitenheimer and Wagner (2017; Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 41, 517-522), five (5) false positives are listed for THC in Table IV, but there should actually be zero (0). Therefore, the Results section (fourth paragraph) should read 'The ELISA showed two FPs for amphetamine, while the DDS®2 showed one FP for cocaine and no FPs for THC'. The authors regret the error.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089128361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/JAT/BKAA045
DO - 10.1093/JAT/BKAA045
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32369174
AN - SCOPUS:85089128361
SN - 0146-4760
VL - 44
SP - E1
JO - Journal of Analytical Toxicology
JF - Journal of Analytical Toxicology
IS - 6
ER -