TY - JOUR
T1 - Embodiment in religious knowledge
AU - Barsalou, Lawrence W.
AU - Barbey, Aron K.
AU - Simmons, W. Kyle
AU - Santos, Ava
N1 - Funding Information:
***We are grateful to Bob McCauley and Harvey Whitehouse for the opportunity to write this article, and for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Preparation of this article was supported by Grant BCS-0212134 from the National Science Foundation to Lawrence W. Barsalou.
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - Increasing evidence suggests that mundane knowledge about objects, people, and events is grounded in the brain's modality-specific systems. The modality-specific representations that become active to represent these entities in actual experience are later used to simulate them in their absence. In particular, simulations of perception, action, and mental states often appear to underlie the representation of knowledge, making it embodied and situated. Findings that support this conclusion are briefly reviewed from cognitive psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. A similar representational process may underlie religious knowledge. In support of this conjecture, embodied knowledge appears central to three aspects of religious experience: religious visions, religious beliefs, and religious rituals. In religious visions, the process of simulation offers a natural account of how these experiences are produced. In religious beliefs, knowledge about the body and the environment are typically central in religious frameworks, and are likely to affect the perception of daily experience. In religious rituals, embodiments appear central to conveying religious ideas metaphorically and to establishing them in memory. To the extent that religious knowledge is like non-religious knowledge, embodiment is likely to play central roles.
AB - Increasing evidence suggests that mundane knowledge about objects, people, and events is grounded in the brain's modality-specific systems. The modality-specific representations that become active to represent these entities in actual experience are later used to simulate them in their absence. In particular, simulations of perception, action, and mental states often appear to underlie the representation of knowledge, making it embodied and situated. Findings that support this conclusion are briefly reviewed from cognitive psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. A similar representational process may underlie religious knowledge. In support of this conjecture, embodied knowledge appears central to three aspects of religious experience: religious visions, religious beliefs, and religious rituals. In religious visions, the process of simulation offers a natural account of how these experiences are produced. In religious beliefs, knowledge about the body and the environment are typically central in religious frameworks, and are likely to affect the perception of daily experience. In religious rituals, embodiments appear central to conveying religious ideas metaphorically and to establishing them in memory. To the extent that religious knowledge is like non-religious knowledge, embodiment is likely to play central roles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249794219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/1568537054068624
DO - 10.1163/1568537054068624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34249794219
SN - 1567-7095
VL - 5
SP - 14
EP - 57
JO - Journal of Cognition and Culture
JF - Journal of Cognition and Culture
IS - 1-2
ER -