Electronic nicotine delivery system landscape in licensed tobacco retailers: Results of a county-level survey in Oklahoma

L. S. Brame, D. S. Mowls, K. E. Damphousse, L. A. Beebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a component of the tobacco retail environment. The aims of this study were to describe the availability, types of ENDS and placement of ENDS relative to traditional tobacco products at franchised licensed tobacco retailers and non-franchised licensed tobacco retailers. Design Observational study. Setting Franchised and non-franchised tobacco retailers in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, USA. Primary and secondary outcome measures The number of stores selling ENDS, the variability in brands of ENDS sold, the location of the ENDS within the retailers, the quantity of ENDS sold compared with traditional tobacco products, and the presence of outdoor signage. Results Data from 57 randomly sampled tobacco retailers were used to describe the presence of ENDS at independent non-franchised and franchised tobacco retailers. The overwhelming majority (90%) of licensed tobacco retailers sold ENDS, and differences were observed between franchised and non-franchised stores. 45 of the 51 retailers (88%) selling ENDS had them placed at the point of sale. 2 of the 21 franchised retailers (9.5%) had ENDS placed at ≤3 feet above floor level compared to none of the 30 non-franchised retailers (0%). Conclusions This small study is the first to characterise ENDS within the tobacco retail environment in a county in Oklahoma, USA. The results from this study demonstrate the complexity of the tobacco retail landscape and generate questions for future studies regarding the incorporation and placement of ENDS in tobacco retail environments.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011053
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Tobacco
Tobacco Products
Surveys and Questionnaires
Observational Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • PUBLIC HEALTH
  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Cite this

@article{5ea04967fc374fbba286d6fc79abf99a,
title = "Electronic nicotine delivery system landscape in licensed tobacco retailers: Results of a county-level survey in Oklahoma",
abstract = "Objectives Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a component of the tobacco retail environment. The aims of this study were to describe the availability, types of ENDS and placement of ENDS relative to traditional tobacco products at franchised licensed tobacco retailers and non-franchised licensed tobacco retailers. Design Observational study. Setting Franchised and non-franchised tobacco retailers in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, USA. Primary and secondary outcome measures The number of stores selling ENDS, the variability in brands of ENDS sold, the location of the ENDS within the retailers, the quantity of ENDS sold compared with traditional tobacco products, and the presence of outdoor signage. Results Data from 57 randomly sampled tobacco retailers were used to describe the presence of ENDS at independent non-franchised and franchised tobacco retailers. The overwhelming majority (90{\%}) of licensed tobacco retailers sold ENDS, and differences were observed between franchised and non-franchised stores. 45 of the 51 retailers (88{\%}) selling ENDS had them placed at the point of sale. 2 of the 21 franchised retailers (9.5{\%}) had ENDS placed at ≤3 feet above floor level compared to none of the 30 non-franchised retailers (0{\%}). Conclusions This small study is the first to characterise ENDS within the tobacco retail environment in a county in Oklahoma, USA. The results from this study demonstrate the complexity of the tobacco retail landscape and generate questions for future studies regarding the incorporation and placement of ENDS in tobacco retail environments.",
keywords = "EPIDEMIOLOGY, PUBLIC HEALTH, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH",
author = "Brame, {L. S.} and Mowls, {D. S.} and Damphousse, {K. E.} and Beebe, {L. A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011053",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

Electronic nicotine delivery system landscape in licensed tobacco retailers : Results of a county-level survey in Oklahoma. / Brame, L. S.; Mowls, D. S.; Damphousse, K. E.; Beebe, L. A.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 6, e011053, 01.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic nicotine delivery system landscape in licensed tobacco retailers

T2 - Results of a county-level survey in Oklahoma

AU - Brame, L. S.

AU - Mowls, D. S.

AU - Damphousse, K. E.

AU - Beebe, L. A.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Objectives Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a component of the tobacco retail environment. The aims of this study were to describe the availability, types of ENDS and placement of ENDS relative to traditional tobacco products at franchised licensed tobacco retailers and non-franchised licensed tobacco retailers. Design Observational study. Setting Franchised and non-franchised tobacco retailers in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, USA. Primary and secondary outcome measures The number of stores selling ENDS, the variability in brands of ENDS sold, the location of the ENDS within the retailers, the quantity of ENDS sold compared with traditional tobacco products, and the presence of outdoor signage. Results Data from 57 randomly sampled tobacco retailers were used to describe the presence of ENDS at independent non-franchised and franchised tobacco retailers. The overwhelming majority (90%) of licensed tobacco retailers sold ENDS, and differences were observed between franchised and non-franchised stores. 45 of the 51 retailers (88%) selling ENDS had them placed at the point of sale. 2 of the 21 franchised retailers (9.5%) had ENDS placed at ≤3 feet above floor level compared to none of the 30 non-franchised retailers (0%). Conclusions This small study is the first to characterise ENDS within the tobacco retail environment in a county in Oklahoma, USA. The results from this study demonstrate the complexity of the tobacco retail landscape and generate questions for future studies regarding the incorporation and placement of ENDS in tobacco retail environments.

AB - Objectives Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a component of the tobacco retail environment. The aims of this study were to describe the availability, types of ENDS and placement of ENDS relative to traditional tobacco products at franchised licensed tobacco retailers and non-franchised licensed tobacco retailers. Design Observational study. Setting Franchised and non-franchised tobacco retailers in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, USA. Primary and secondary outcome measures The number of stores selling ENDS, the variability in brands of ENDS sold, the location of the ENDS within the retailers, the quantity of ENDS sold compared with traditional tobacco products, and the presence of outdoor signage. Results Data from 57 randomly sampled tobacco retailers were used to describe the presence of ENDS at independent non-franchised and franchised tobacco retailers. The overwhelming majority (90%) of licensed tobacco retailers sold ENDS, and differences were observed between franchised and non-franchised stores. 45 of the 51 retailers (88%) selling ENDS had them placed at the point of sale. 2 of the 21 franchised retailers (9.5%) had ENDS placed at ≤3 feet above floor level compared to none of the 30 non-franchised retailers (0%). Conclusions This small study is the first to characterise ENDS within the tobacco retail environment in a county in Oklahoma, USA. The results from this study demonstrate the complexity of the tobacco retail landscape and generate questions for future studies regarding the incorporation and placement of ENDS in tobacco retail environments.

KW - EPIDEMIOLOGY

KW - PUBLIC HEALTH

KW - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974652914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011053

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011053

M3 - Article

C2 - 27266774

AN - SCOPUS:84974652914

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e011053

ER -