Different interaction between tricyclic antidepressants and mecamylamine with the human α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel

Hugo R. Arias, Katarzyna M. Targowska-Duda, Dominik Feuerbach, Carl J. Sullivan, Ryszard Maciejewski, Krzysztof Jozwiak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The interaction of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with the human (h)α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in different conformational states was compared with that for mecamylamine by using functional and structural approaches including, Ca2+ influx, radioligand binding, and molecular docking. The results established that: (a) [3H]imipramine binds to a single site with relatively high affinity (Kd = 0.41 ± 0.04 μM), (b) imipramine inhibits [3H]imipramine binding to the resting/κ-bungarotoxin-bound AChR (Ki = 0.68 ± 0.08 μM) with practically the same affinity as to the desensitized/epibatidine-bound AChR (Ki = 0.83 ± 0.08 μM), suggesting that TCAs do not discriminate between these conformational states, and (c) although TCAs (IC50 ∼1.8-2.7 μM) and mecamylamine (IC50 = 3.3 ± 0.4 μM) inhibit (±)-epibatidine-induced Ca2+ influx with potencies in the same concentration range, TCAs (Ki ∼1-3.6 μM), but not mecamylamine (apparent IC50 ∼0.2 mM), inhibit [3H]imipramine binding to hα3β4 AChRs in different conformational states. This is explained by our docking results where imipramine, in the neutral and protonated states, interacts with the leucine (position 9′) and valine/phenylalanine (position 13′) rings, whereas protonated mecamylamine (>99% at physiological pH) interacts with the outer ring (position 20′). Our data indicate that TCAs bind to overlapping sites located between the serine and valine/phenylalanine rings in the hα3β4 AChR ion channel, whereas protonated mecamylamine can be attracted to the channel mouth before blocking ion flux by interacting with a luminal site in its neutral state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-649
Number of pages8
JournalNeurochemistry International
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mecamylamine
Imipramine
Tricyclic Antidepressive Agents
Nicotinic Receptors
Ion Channels
epibatidine
Cholinergic Receptors
Inhibitory Concentration 50
Valine
Phenylalanine
Bungarotoxins
Leucine
Serine
Mouth
Ions

Keywords

  • Ca influx
  • Conformational states
  • Mecamylamine
  • Molecular modeling
  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
  • Noncompetitive antagonists
  • Radioligand binding
  • Tricyclic antidepressants

Cite this

Arias, Hugo R. ; Targowska-Duda, Katarzyna M. ; Feuerbach, Dominik ; Sullivan, Carl J. ; Maciejewski, Ryszard ; Jozwiak, Krzysztof. / Different interaction between tricyclic antidepressants and mecamylamine with the human α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel. In: Neurochemistry International. 2010 ; Vol. 56, No. 4. pp. 642-649.
@article{f67a7f6854e748d599ebece6f6f3c251,
title = "Different interaction between tricyclic antidepressants and mecamylamine with the human α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel",
abstract = "The interaction of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with the human (h)α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in different conformational states was compared with that for mecamylamine by using functional and structural approaches including, Ca2+ influx, radioligand binding, and molecular docking. The results established that: (a) [3H]imipramine binds to a single site with relatively high affinity (Kd = 0.41 ± 0.04 μM), (b) imipramine inhibits [3H]imipramine binding to the resting/κ-bungarotoxin-bound AChR (Ki = 0.68 ± 0.08 μM) with practically the same affinity as to the desensitized/epibatidine-bound AChR (Ki = 0.83 ± 0.08 μM), suggesting that TCAs do not discriminate between these conformational states, and (c) although TCAs (IC50 ∼1.8-2.7 μM) and mecamylamine (IC50 = 3.3 ± 0.4 μM) inhibit (±)-epibatidine-induced Ca2+ influx with potencies in the same concentration range, TCAs (Ki ∼1-3.6 μM), but not mecamylamine (apparent IC50 ∼0.2 mM), inhibit [3H]imipramine binding to hα3β4 AChRs in different conformational states. This is explained by our docking results where imipramine, in the neutral and protonated states, interacts with the leucine (position 9′) and valine/phenylalanine (position 13′) rings, whereas protonated mecamylamine (>99{\%} at physiological pH) interacts with the outer ring (position 20′). Our data indicate that TCAs bind to overlapping sites located between the serine and valine/phenylalanine rings in the hα3β4 AChR ion channel, whereas protonated mecamylamine can be attracted to the channel mouth before blocking ion flux by interacting with a luminal site in its neutral state.",
keywords = "Ca influx, Conformational states, Mecamylamine, Molecular modeling, Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, Noncompetitive antagonists, Radioligand binding, Tricyclic antidepressants",
author = "Arias, {Hugo R.} and Targowska-Duda, {Katarzyna M.} and Dominik Feuerbach and Sullivan, {Carl J.} and Ryszard Maciejewski and Krzysztof Jozwiak",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuint.2010.01.011",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "642--649",
journal = "Neurochemistry International",
issn = "0197-0186",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Different interaction between tricyclic antidepressants and mecamylamine with the human α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel. / Arias, Hugo R.; Targowska-Duda, Katarzyna M.; Feuerbach, Dominik; Sullivan, Carl J.; Maciejewski, Ryszard; Jozwiak, Krzysztof.

In: Neurochemistry International, Vol. 56, No. 4, 01.03.2010, p. 642-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different interaction between tricyclic antidepressants and mecamylamine with the human α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel

AU - Arias, Hugo R.

AU - Targowska-Duda, Katarzyna M.

AU - Feuerbach, Dominik

AU - Sullivan, Carl J.

AU - Maciejewski, Ryszard

AU - Jozwiak, Krzysztof

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - The interaction of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with the human (h)α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in different conformational states was compared with that for mecamylamine by using functional and structural approaches including, Ca2+ influx, radioligand binding, and molecular docking. The results established that: (a) [3H]imipramine binds to a single site with relatively high affinity (Kd = 0.41 ± 0.04 μM), (b) imipramine inhibits [3H]imipramine binding to the resting/κ-bungarotoxin-bound AChR (Ki = 0.68 ± 0.08 μM) with practically the same affinity as to the desensitized/epibatidine-bound AChR (Ki = 0.83 ± 0.08 μM), suggesting that TCAs do not discriminate between these conformational states, and (c) although TCAs (IC50 ∼1.8-2.7 μM) and mecamylamine (IC50 = 3.3 ± 0.4 μM) inhibit (±)-epibatidine-induced Ca2+ influx with potencies in the same concentration range, TCAs (Ki ∼1-3.6 μM), but not mecamylamine (apparent IC50 ∼0.2 mM), inhibit [3H]imipramine binding to hα3β4 AChRs in different conformational states. This is explained by our docking results where imipramine, in the neutral and protonated states, interacts with the leucine (position 9′) and valine/phenylalanine (position 13′) rings, whereas protonated mecamylamine (>99% at physiological pH) interacts with the outer ring (position 20′). Our data indicate that TCAs bind to overlapping sites located between the serine and valine/phenylalanine rings in the hα3β4 AChR ion channel, whereas protonated mecamylamine can be attracted to the channel mouth before blocking ion flux by interacting with a luminal site in its neutral state.

AB - The interaction of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) with the human (h)α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in different conformational states was compared with that for mecamylamine by using functional and structural approaches including, Ca2+ influx, radioligand binding, and molecular docking. The results established that: (a) [3H]imipramine binds to a single site with relatively high affinity (Kd = 0.41 ± 0.04 μM), (b) imipramine inhibits [3H]imipramine binding to the resting/κ-bungarotoxin-bound AChR (Ki = 0.68 ± 0.08 μM) with practically the same affinity as to the desensitized/epibatidine-bound AChR (Ki = 0.83 ± 0.08 μM), suggesting that TCAs do not discriminate between these conformational states, and (c) although TCAs (IC50 ∼1.8-2.7 μM) and mecamylamine (IC50 = 3.3 ± 0.4 μM) inhibit (±)-epibatidine-induced Ca2+ influx with potencies in the same concentration range, TCAs (Ki ∼1-3.6 μM), but not mecamylamine (apparent IC50 ∼0.2 mM), inhibit [3H]imipramine binding to hα3β4 AChRs in different conformational states. This is explained by our docking results where imipramine, in the neutral and protonated states, interacts with the leucine (position 9′) and valine/phenylalanine (position 13′) rings, whereas protonated mecamylamine (>99% at physiological pH) interacts with the outer ring (position 20′). Our data indicate that TCAs bind to overlapping sites located between the serine and valine/phenylalanine rings in the hα3β4 AChR ion channel, whereas protonated mecamylamine can be attracted to the channel mouth before blocking ion flux by interacting with a luminal site in its neutral state.

KW - Ca influx

KW - Conformational states

KW - Mecamylamine

KW - Molecular modeling

KW - Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

KW - Noncompetitive antagonists

KW - Radioligand binding

KW - Tricyclic antidepressants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77249089718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.01.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 20117161

AN - SCOPUS:77249089718

VL - 56

SP - 642

EP - 649

JO - Neurochemistry International

JF - Neurochemistry International

SN - 0197-0186

IS - 4

ER -