Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures

Antonio F. Hernandez, Aleksandra Buha, Carolina Constantin, David R. Wallace, Dimosthenis Sarigiannis, Monica Neagu, Biljana Antonijevic, A. Wallace Hayes, Martin F. Wilks, Aristidis Tsatsakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans are exposed to multiple chemicals on a daily basis instead of to just a single chemical, yet the majority of existing toxicity data comes from single-chemical exposure. Multiple factors must be considered such as the route, concentration, duration, and the timing of exposure when determining toxicity to the organism. The need for adequate model systems (in vivo, in vitro, in silico and mathematical) is paramount for better understanding of chemical mixture toxicity. Currently, shortcomings plague each model system as investigators struggle to find the appropriate balance of rigor, reproducibility and appropriateness in mixture toxicity studies. Significant questions exist when comparing single-to mixture-chemical toxicity concerning additivity, synergism, potentiation, or antagonism. Dose/concentration relevance is a major consideration and should be subthreshold for better accuracy in toxicity assessment. Previous work was limited by the technology and methodology of the time, but recent advances have resulted in significant progress in the study of mixture toxicology. Novel technologies have added insight to data obtained from in vivo studies for predictive toxicity testing. These include new in vitro models: omics-related tools, organs-on-a-chip and 3D cell culture, and in silico methods. Taken together, all these modern methodologies improve the understanding of the multiple toxicity pathways associated with adverse outcomes (e.g., adverse outcome pathways), thus allowing investigators to better predict risks linked to exposure to chemical mixtures. As technology and knowledge advance, our ability to harness and integrate separate streams of evidence regarding outcomes associated with chemical mixture exposure improves. As many national and international organizations are currently stressing, studies on chemical mixture toxicity are of primary importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2741-2757
Number of pages17
JournalArchives of Toxicology
Volume93
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Toxicity
Technology
Computer Simulation
Research Personnel
Plague
Toxicology
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell culture
In Vitro Techniques
Testing

Keywords

  • Chemical mixtures
  • Integration of evidence
  • Risk assessment
  • Toxicity testing

Cite this

Hernandez, Antonio F. ; Buha, Aleksandra ; Constantin, Carolina ; Wallace, David R. ; Sarigiannis, Dimosthenis ; Neagu, Monica ; Antonijevic, Biljana ; Hayes, A. Wallace ; Wilks, Martin F. ; Tsatsakis, Aristidis. / Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures. In: Archives of Toxicology. 2019 ; Vol. 93, No. 10. pp. 2741-2757.
@article{96df0c6f020e402e8929c89b0883c579,
title = "Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures",
abstract = "Humans are exposed to multiple chemicals on a daily basis instead of to just a single chemical, yet the majority of existing toxicity data comes from single-chemical exposure. Multiple factors must be considered such as the route, concentration, duration, and the timing of exposure when determining toxicity to the organism. The need for adequate model systems (in vivo, in vitro, in silico and mathematical) is paramount for better understanding of chemical mixture toxicity. Currently, shortcomings plague each model system as investigators struggle to find the appropriate balance of rigor, reproducibility and appropriateness in mixture toxicity studies. Significant questions exist when comparing single-to mixture-chemical toxicity concerning additivity, synergism, potentiation, or antagonism. Dose/concentration relevance is a major consideration and should be subthreshold for better accuracy in toxicity assessment. Previous work was limited by the technology and methodology of the time, but recent advances have resulted in significant progress in the study of mixture toxicology. Novel technologies have added insight to data obtained from in vivo studies for predictive toxicity testing. These include new in vitro models: omics-related tools, organs-on-a-chip and 3D cell culture, and in silico methods. Taken together, all these modern methodologies improve the understanding of the multiple toxicity pathways associated with adverse outcomes (e.g., adverse outcome pathways), thus allowing investigators to better predict risks linked to exposure to chemical mixtures. As technology and knowledge advance, our ability to harness and integrate separate streams of evidence regarding outcomes associated with chemical mixture exposure improves. As many national and international organizations are currently stressing, studies on chemical mixture toxicity are of primary importance.",
keywords = "Chemical mixtures, Integration of evidence, Risk assessment, Toxicity testing",
author = "Hernandez, {Antonio F.} and Aleksandra Buha and Carolina Constantin and Wallace, {David R.} and Dimosthenis Sarigiannis and Monica Neagu and Biljana Antonijevic and Hayes, {A. Wallace} and Wilks, {Martin F.} and Aristidis Tsatsakis",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00204-019-02547-x",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "2741--2757",
journal = "Archives of Toxicology",
issn = "0340-5761",
number = "10",

}

Hernandez, AF, Buha, A, Constantin, C, Wallace, DR, Sarigiannis, D, Neagu, M, Antonijevic, B, Hayes, AW, Wilks, MF & Tsatsakis, A 2019, 'Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures', Archives of Toxicology, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 2741-2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02547-x

Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures. / Hernandez, Antonio F.; Buha, Aleksandra; Constantin, Carolina; Wallace, David R.; Sarigiannis, Dimosthenis; Neagu, Monica; Antonijevic, Biljana; Hayes, A. Wallace; Wilks, Martin F.; Tsatsakis, Aristidis.

In: Archives of Toxicology, Vol. 93, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 2741-2757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical assessment and integration of separate lines of evidence for risk assessment of chemical mixtures

AU - Hernandez, Antonio F.

AU - Buha, Aleksandra

AU - Constantin, Carolina

AU - Wallace, David R.

AU - Sarigiannis, Dimosthenis

AU - Neagu, Monica

AU - Antonijevic, Biljana

AU - Hayes, A. Wallace

AU - Wilks, Martin F.

AU - Tsatsakis, Aristidis

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Humans are exposed to multiple chemicals on a daily basis instead of to just a single chemical, yet the majority of existing toxicity data comes from single-chemical exposure. Multiple factors must be considered such as the route, concentration, duration, and the timing of exposure when determining toxicity to the organism. The need for adequate model systems (in vivo, in vitro, in silico and mathematical) is paramount for better understanding of chemical mixture toxicity. Currently, shortcomings plague each model system as investigators struggle to find the appropriate balance of rigor, reproducibility and appropriateness in mixture toxicity studies. Significant questions exist when comparing single-to mixture-chemical toxicity concerning additivity, synergism, potentiation, or antagonism. Dose/concentration relevance is a major consideration and should be subthreshold for better accuracy in toxicity assessment. Previous work was limited by the technology and methodology of the time, but recent advances have resulted in significant progress in the study of mixture toxicology. Novel technologies have added insight to data obtained from in vivo studies for predictive toxicity testing. These include new in vitro models: omics-related tools, organs-on-a-chip and 3D cell culture, and in silico methods. Taken together, all these modern methodologies improve the understanding of the multiple toxicity pathways associated with adverse outcomes (e.g., adverse outcome pathways), thus allowing investigators to better predict risks linked to exposure to chemical mixtures. As technology and knowledge advance, our ability to harness and integrate separate streams of evidence regarding outcomes associated with chemical mixture exposure improves. As many national and international organizations are currently stressing, studies on chemical mixture toxicity are of primary importance.

AB - Humans are exposed to multiple chemicals on a daily basis instead of to just a single chemical, yet the majority of existing toxicity data comes from single-chemical exposure. Multiple factors must be considered such as the route, concentration, duration, and the timing of exposure when determining toxicity to the organism. The need for adequate model systems (in vivo, in vitro, in silico and mathematical) is paramount for better understanding of chemical mixture toxicity. Currently, shortcomings plague each model system as investigators struggle to find the appropriate balance of rigor, reproducibility and appropriateness in mixture toxicity studies. Significant questions exist when comparing single-to mixture-chemical toxicity concerning additivity, synergism, potentiation, or antagonism. Dose/concentration relevance is a major consideration and should be subthreshold for better accuracy in toxicity assessment. Previous work was limited by the technology and methodology of the time, but recent advances have resulted in significant progress in the study of mixture toxicology. Novel technologies have added insight to data obtained from in vivo studies for predictive toxicity testing. These include new in vitro models: omics-related tools, organs-on-a-chip and 3D cell culture, and in silico methods. Taken together, all these modern methodologies improve the understanding of the multiple toxicity pathways associated with adverse outcomes (e.g., adverse outcome pathways), thus allowing investigators to better predict risks linked to exposure to chemical mixtures. As technology and knowledge advance, our ability to harness and integrate separate streams of evidence regarding outcomes associated with chemical mixture exposure improves. As many national and international organizations are currently stressing, studies on chemical mixture toxicity are of primary importance.

KW - Chemical mixtures

KW - Integration of evidence

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Toxicity testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073126625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00204-019-02547-x

DO - 10.1007/s00204-019-02547-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 31520250

AN - SCOPUS:85073126625

VL - 93

SP - 2741

EP - 2757

JO - Archives of Toxicology

JF - Archives of Toxicology

SN - 0340-5761

IS - 10

ER -