Community-Based Participatory Intervention Research with American Indian Communities: What is the State of the Science?

Jordan B. Hearod, Marianna S. Wetherill, Alicia L. Salvatore, Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We conducted a 2-phase systematic review of the literature to examine the nature and outcomes of health research using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach with AI communities to assess both the value and the impact of CBPR, identify gaps in knowledge, and guide recommendations for AI research agendas. Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched the peer-reviewed literature published from 1995 to 2016 and identified and reviewed 42 unique intervention studies. We identified and catalogued key study characteristics, and using the Reliability-Tested Guidelines for Assessing Participatory Research Projects, we quantified adherence to participatory research principles across its four domains. Finally, we examined any association between community participation score and health outcomes. The majority of studies (76.7%) used an observational study design with diabetes, cancer, substance abuse, and tobacco being the most common topics. Half of the articles reported an increase in knowledge as the primary outcome. Our findings suggest that a CBPR orientation yields improved community outcomes. However, we could not conclude that community participation was directly associated with an improvement in health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Developments in Nutrition
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Community-Based Participatory Research
North American Indians
American Indians
Health
Research
Guidelines
community service
Substance-Related Disorders
Tobacco
Observational Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
substance abuse
systematic review
observational studies
peers
research projects
diabetes
Neoplasms
tobacco
experimental design

Keywords

  • American Indian
  • CBPR
  • community-based participatory research
  • intervention science
  • Native American
  • systematic review

Cite this

@article{a817c82c73474f318f0179a08a70c503,
title = "Community-Based Participatory Intervention Research with American Indian Communities: What is the State of the Science?",
abstract = "We conducted a 2-phase systematic review of the literature to examine the nature and outcomes of health research using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach with AI communities to assess both the value and the impact of CBPR, identify gaps in knowledge, and guide recommendations for AI research agendas. Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched the peer-reviewed literature published from 1995 to 2016 and identified and reviewed 42 unique intervention studies. We identified and catalogued key study characteristics, and using the Reliability-Tested Guidelines for Assessing Participatory Research Projects, we quantified adherence to participatory research principles across its four domains. Finally, we examined any association between community participation score and health outcomes. The majority of studies (76.7{\%}) used an observational study design with diabetes, cancer, substance abuse, and tobacco being the most common topics. Half of the articles reported an increase in knowledge as the primary outcome. Our findings suggest that a CBPR orientation yields improved community outcomes. However, we could not conclude that community participation was directly associated with an improvement in health outcomes.",
keywords = "American Indian, CBPR, community-based participatory research, intervention science, Native American, systematic review",
author = "Hearod, {Jordan B.} and Wetherill, {Marianna S.} and Salvatore, {Alicia L.} and Jernigan, {Valarie Blue Bird}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1093/cdn/nzz008",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "Current Developments in Nutrition",
issn = "2475-2991",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Community-Based Participatory Intervention Research with American Indian Communities : What is the State of the Science? / Hearod, Jordan B.; Wetherill, Marianna S.; Salvatore, Alicia L.; Jernigan, Valarie Blue Bird.

In: Current Developments in Nutrition, Vol. 3, 13.02.2019, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community-Based Participatory Intervention Research with American Indian Communities

T2 - What is the State of the Science?

AU - Hearod, Jordan B.

AU - Wetherill, Marianna S.

AU - Salvatore, Alicia L.

AU - Jernigan, Valarie Blue Bird

PY - 2019/2/13

Y1 - 2019/2/13

N2 - We conducted a 2-phase systematic review of the literature to examine the nature and outcomes of health research using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach with AI communities to assess both the value and the impact of CBPR, identify gaps in knowledge, and guide recommendations for AI research agendas. Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched the peer-reviewed literature published from 1995 to 2016 and identified and reviewed 42 unique intervention studies. We identified and catalogued key study characteristics, and using the Reliability-Tested Guidelines for Assessing Participatory Research Projects, we quantified adherence to participatory research principles across its four domains. Finally, we examined any association between community participation score and health outcomes. The majority of studies (76.7%) used an observational study design with diabetes, cancer, substance abuse, and tobacco being the most common topics. Half of the articles reported an increase in knowledge as the primary outcome. Our findings suggest that a CBPR orientation yields improved community outcomes. However, we could not conclude that community participation was directly associated with an improvement in health outcomes.

AB - We conducted a 2-phase systematic review of the literature to examine the nature and outcomes of health research using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach with AI communities to assess both the value and the impact of CBPR, identify gaps in knowledge, and guide recommendations for AI research agendas. Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched the peer-reviewed literature published from 1995 to 2016 and identified and reviewed 42 unique intervention studies. We identified and catalogued key study characteristics, and using the Reliability-Tested Guidelines for Assessing Participatory Research Projects, we quantified adherence to participatory research principles across its four domains. Finally, we examined any association between community participation score and health outcomes. The majority of studies (76.7%) used an observational study design with diabetes, cancer, substance abuse, and tobacco being the most common topics. Half of the articles reported an increase in knowledge as the primary outcome. Our findings suggest that a CBPR orientation yields improved community outcomes. However, we could not conclude that community participation was directly associated with an improvement in health outcomes.

KW - American Indian

KW - CBPR

KW - community-based participatory research

KW - intervention science

KW - Native American

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074876517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/cdn/nzz008

DO - 10.1093/cdn/nzz008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074876517

VL - 3

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - Current Developments in Nutrition

JF - Current Developments in Nutrition

SN - 2475-2991

ER -