Clinical Question: Does Medical Evidence Support Routine Oronasopharyngeal Suction at Delivery?

M. Blake Evans, William Po

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) is regularly performed in neonates at delivery in many hospitals across the country today. Although ONPS is a technique that has essentially become habitual for most obstetricians, its theorized usefulness to help promote expeditious lung aeration after delivery by removal of amniotic fluid, meconium, mucus and blood that may otherwise be aspirated by the newborn, is currently not recommended. ONPS can cause vagal stimulation-induced bradycardia and thus hypercapnea, iatrogenic infection due to mucous membrane injury, and development of subsequent neonatal brain injury due to changes in cerebral blood flow regulation, particularly in premature infants. Multiple studies that have been performed comparing routine use of ONPS to no intervention controls indicate that newborns receiving ONPS took a longer time to achieve normal oxygen saturations, caused apneic episodes, and caused disturbances in heart rate (mainly bradycardia) compared to the control groups. Although the ONPS groups revealed no significantly different APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, the ONPS groups took longer than the control group to reach an arterial oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 92% in the first minutes of life. Currently, Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines discourage the use of or meconium-stained amniotic fluid and in the absence of obvious obstruction. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights various literature sources revealing that the routine use of ONPS at the time of delivery can cause more harm than good, if any good at all.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-142
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association
Volume109
Issue number4-5
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Suction
Meconium
Newborn Infant
Amniotic Fluid
Bradycardia
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Oxygen
Control Groups
Mucus
Premature Infants
Resuscitation
Brain Injuries
Mucous Membrane
Heart Rate
Guidelines
Lung
Wounds and Injuries
Infection

Cite this

@article{2bf74353edbe4796a9a281521cc57531,
title = "Clinical Question: Does Medical Evidence Support Routine Oronasopharyngeal Suction at Delivery?",
abstract = "Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) is regularly performed in neonates at delivery in many hospitals across the country today. Although ONPS is a technique that has essentially become habitual for most obstetricians, its theorized usefulness to help promote expeditious lung aeration after delivery by removal of amniotic fluid, meconium, mucus and blood that may otherwise be aspirated by the newborn, is currently not recommended. ONPS can cause vagal stimulation-induced bradycardia and thus hypercapnea, iatrogenic infection due to mucous membrane injury, and development of subsequent neonatal brain injury due to changes in cerebral blood flow regulation, particularly in premature infants. Multiple studies that have been performed comparing routine use of ONPS to no intervention controls indicate that newborns receiving ONPS took a longer time to achieve normal oxygen saturations, caused apneic episodes, and caused disturbances in heart rate (mainly bradycardia) compared to the control groups. Although the ONPS groups revealed no significantly different APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, the ONPS groups took longer than the control group to reach an arterial oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 92{\%} in the first minutes of life. Currently, Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines discourage the use of or meconium-stained amniotic fluid and in the absence of obvious obstruction. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights various literature sources revealing that the routine use of ONPS at the time of delivery can cause more harm than good, if any good at all.",
author = "Evans, {M. Blake} and William Po",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "140--142",
journal = "The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association",
issn = "0030-1876",
publisher = "Oklahoma State Medical Association",
number = "4-5",

}

Clinical Question : Does Medical Evidence Support Routine Oronasopharyngeal Suction at Delivery? / Evans, M. Blake; Po, William.

In: The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association, Vol. 109, No. 4-5, 01.04.2016, p. 140-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Question

T2 - Does Medical Evidence Support Routine Oronasopharyngeal Suction at Delivery?

AU - Evans, M. Blake

AU - Po, William

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) is regularly performed in neonates at delivery in many hospitals across the country today. Although ONPS is a technique that has essentially become habitual for most obstetricians, its theorized usefulness to help promote expeditious lung aeration after delivery by removal of amniotic fluid, meconium, mucus and blood that may otherwise be aspirated by the newborn, is currently not recommended. ONPS can cause vagal stimulation-induced bradycardia and thus hypercapnea, iatrogenic infection due to mucous membrane injury, and development of subsequent neonatal brain injury due to changes in cerebral blood flow regulation, particularly in premature infants. Multiple studies that have been performed comparing routine use of ONPS to no intervention controls indicate that newborns receiving ONPS took a longer time to achieve normal oxygen saturations, caused apneic episodes, and caused disturbances in heart rate (mainly bradycardia) compared to the control groups. Although the ONPS groups revealed no significantly different APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, the ONPS groups took longer than the control group to reach an arterial oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 92% in the first minutes of life. Currently, Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines discourage the use of or meconium-stained amniotic fluid and in the absence of obvious obstruction. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights various literature sources revealing that the routine use of ONPS at the time of delivery can cause more harm than good, if any good at all.

AB - Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) is regularly performed in neonates at delivery in many hospitals across the country today. Although ONPS is a technique that has essentially become habitual for most obstetricians, its theorized usefulness to help promote expeditious lung aeration after delivery by removal of amniotic fluid, meconium, mucus and blood that may otherwise be aspirated by the newborn, is currently not recommended. ONPS can cause vagal stimulation-induced bradycardia and thus hypercapnea, iatrogenic infection due to mucous membrane injury, and development of subsequent neonatal brain injury due to changes in cerebral blood flow regulation, particularly in premature infants. Multiple studies that have been performed comparing routine use of ONPS to no intervention controls indicate that newborns receiving ONPS took a longer time to achieve normal oxygen saturations, caused apneic episodes, and caused disturbances in heart rate (mainly bradycardia) compared to the control groups. Although the ONPS groups revealed no significantly different APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, the ONPS groups took longer than the control group to reach an arterial oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 92% in the first minutes of life. Currently, Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines discourage the use of or meconium-stained amniotic fluid and in the absence of obvious obstruction. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights various literature sources revealing that the routine use of ONPS at the time of delivery can cause more harm than good, if any good at all.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020343052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27328554

AN - SCOPUS:85020343052

VL - 109

SP - 140

EP - 142

JO - The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association

JF - The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association

SN - 0030-1876

IS - 4-5

ER -