Assessing the Reporting and Frequency of Harms in Systematic Reviews Focused on Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies: A Cross-sectional Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality of harms reporting in systematic reviews (SRs) regarding minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIHs). 

Data Sources: We performed a cross-sectional analysis on SRs addressing MIHs to assess completeness of harms reporting. Hysterectomies are common gynecologic procedures and are associated with complications. Such adverse events can directly affect physician decision making and patient outcomes. Thus, it is important that SRs equally weigh the harms and benefits surrounding MIHs. 

Methods of Study Selection: On May 15, 2022, we searched MEDLINE (PubMed and Ovid), Embase, Epistemonikos, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for SRs with or without a meta-analysis on MIH for any indication. Eligible studies underwent full-text screening, data extraction, harms reporting assessment, and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 quality assessment in a masked, duplicate fashion. The corrected covered area was calculated to indicate any overlap between SR dyads. 

Tabulation, Integration, and Results: A total of 52 SRs met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. We found that >44 of included SRs (of 52; 84.6%) reported >50% of the harms items. Completeness of harms reporting was significantly associated with harms specification as a primary outcome (p <.05). The corrected covered area was 0.60%. 

Conclusion: The harms reporting was more complete than hypothesized, but still had deficiencies throughout, such as inconsistent use of severity scales to classify harms. Even though MIH harms reporting in sample SRs was more complete than other fields of medicine, it was still suboptimal overall and requires refinement.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Complications
  • Gynecology
  • Harms
  • Laparoscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the Reporting and Frequency of Harms in Systematic Reviews Focused on Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies: A Cross-sectional Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this