An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials

Jake X. Checketts, Jonathan Riddle, Zach Zaaza, Marshall A. Boose, Jake H. Whitener, Matt Vassar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Spin is a specific type of reporting bias that misrepresents data and results within randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Because spin may provide a surgeon with an inaccurate representation of trial results, thus misconstruing the surgeons' interpretation thereof and possibly negatively affecting patient care, it is important that spin is identified within publications. The primary goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of spin found within the abstracts of lower extremity joint trials. Methods: Using Google Scholar's H-5 index, we selected the top 20 journals in the orthopedic surgery category. We then conducted a PubMed search on July 2nd, 2018 using the advanced search feature, encompassing all RCTs published in these journals from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. Spin was evaluated using a standardized protocol, using a previously published protocol on the Open Science Network. Results: Our final sample consisted of 46 trials published in 9 of the top 20 orthopedic surgery journals. Spin was found in 27 (58.7%) of the 46 abstracts. Evidence of spin in the abstract results was found in 19 (41.3%) of the 46 articles, and spin in abstract conclusions was found in 15 (32.6%) of the 46 articles. Conclusions: Our study found that a significant number of lower extremity joint RCTs contain one or more form of spin in either their abstract results, conclusions, or both. In addition, our investigation revealed that a sizable portion of these lower extremity orthopedic joint RCTs are not registered or do not report their registration, and funding sources are also underreported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1008-1012
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Randomized Controlled Trials
Joints
Orthopedics
PubMed
Publications
Patient Care
Surgeons

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • joint trials
  • publication bias
  • reporting bias
  • spin

Cite this

@article{d20b47cb52d24708a6fb819e01c3b8ba,
title = "An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials",
abstract = "Background: Spin is a specific type of reporting bias that misrepresents data and results within randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Because spin may provide a surgeon with an inaccurate representation of trial results, thus misconstruing the surgeons' interpretation thereof and possibly negatively affecting patient care, it is important that spin is identified within publications. The primary goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of spin found within the abstracts of lower extremity joint trials. Methods: Using Google Scholar's H-5 index, we selected the top 20 journals in the orthopedic surgery category. We then conducted a PubMed search on July 2nd, 2018 using the advanced search feature, encompassing all RCTs published in these journals from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. Spin was evaluated using a standardized protocol, using a previously published protocol on the Open Science Network. Results: Our final sample consisted of 46 trials published in 9 of the top 20 orthopedic surgery journals. Spin was found in 27 (58.7{\%}) of the 46 abstracts. Evidence of spin in the abstract results was found in 19 (41.3{\%}) of the 46 articles, and spin in abstract conclusions was found in 15 (32.6{\%}) of the 46 articles. Conclusions: Our study found that a significant number of lower extremity joint RCTs contain one or more form of spin in either their abstract results, conclusions, or both. In addition, our investigation revealed that a sizable portion of these lower extremity orthopedic joint RCTs are not registered or do not report their registration, and funding sources are also underreported.",
keywords = "arthroplasty, joint trials, publication bias, reporting bias, spin",
author = "Checketts, {Jake X.} and Jonathan Riddle and Zach Zaaza and Boose, {Marshall A.} and Whitener, {Jake H.} and Matt Vassar",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.016",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1008--1012",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials. / Checketts, Jake X.; Riddle, Jonathan; Zaaza, Zach; Boose, Marshall A.; Whitener, Jake H.; Vassar, Matt.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 34, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 1008-1012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials

AU - Checketts, Jake X.

AU - Riddle, Jonathan

AU - Zaaza, Zach

AU - Boose, Marshall A.

AU - Whitener, Jake H.

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: Spin is a specific type of reporting bias that misrepresents data and results within randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Because spin may provide a surgeon with an inaccurate representation of trial results, thus misconstruing the surgeons' interpretation thereof and possibly negatively affecting patient care, it is important that spin is identified within publications. The primary goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of spin found within the abstracts of lower extremity joint trials. Methods: Using Google Scholar's H-5 index, we selected the top 20 journals in the orthopedic surgery category. We then conducted a PubMed search on July 2nd, 2018 using the advanced search feature, encompassing all RCTs published in these journals from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. Spin was evaluated using a standardized protocol, using a previously published protocol on the Open Science Network. Results: Our final sample consisted of 46 trials published in 9 of the top 20 orthopedic surgery journals. Spin was found in 27 (58.7%) of the 46 abstracts. Evidence of spin in the abstract results was found in 19 (41.3%) of the 46 articles, and spin in abstract conclusions was found in 15 (32.6%) of the 46 articles. Conclusions: Our study found that a significant number of lower extremity joint RCTs contain one or more form of spin in either their abstract results, conclusions, or both. In addition, our investigation revealed that a sizable portion of these lower extremity orthopedic joint RCTs are not registered or do not report their registration, and funding sources are also underreported.

AB - Background: Spin is a specific type of reporting bias that misrepresents data and results within randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Because spin may provide a surgeon with an inaccurate representation of trial results, thus misconstruing the surgeons' interpretation thereof and possibly negatively affecting patient care, it is important that spin is identified within publications. The primary goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of spin found within the abstracts of lower extremity joint trials. Methods: Using Google Scholar's H-5 index, we selected the top 20 journals in the orthopedic surgery category. We then conducted a PubMed search on July 2nd, 2018 using the advanced search feature, encompassing all RCTs published in these journals from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. Spin was evaluated using a standardized protocol, using a previously published protocol on the Open Science Network. Results: Our final sample consisted of 46 trials published in 9 of the top 20 orthopedic surgery journals. Spin was found in 27 (58.7%) of the 46 abstracts. Evidence of spin in the abstract results was found in 19 (41.3%) of the 46 articles, and spin in abstract conclusions was found in 15 (32.6%) of the 46 articles. Conclusions: Our study found that a significant number of lower extremity joint RCTs contain one or more form of spin in either their abstract results, conclusions, or both. In addition, our investigation revealed that a sizable portion of these lower extremity orthopedic joint RCTs are not registered or do not report their registration, and funding sources are also underreported.

KW - arthroplasty

KW - joint trials

KW - publication bias

KW - reporting bias

KW - spin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060952854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.016

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 30733070

AN - SCOPUS:85060952854

VL - 34

SP - 1008

EP - 1012

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 5

ER -