An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements among Plastic Surgery Journals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Ensuring that published studies are of the highest methodological quality is a critical step in plastic surgery's transition to a more evidence-based field. Reporting guidelines and reporting of clinical trial registration may serve as promising avenues of increasing the methodological quality in plastic surgery trials. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate at which plastic surgery journals require reporting guidelines, as well as the effect these policies have on adherence to reporting guidelines. Methods Using journal's "Instructions for Authors," we conducted a cross-sectional survey to evaluate journal policies regarding adherence to reporting guidelines and trial registration. We also examined whether trials published in journals referencing Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) had higher rates of compliance with publishing a CONSORT flow diagram and whether journals with trial registration policies were more likely to contain registered trials than journals without these requirements. Results Of the 20 plastic surgery journals, 13 (65%) did not mention a single guideline within their instructions to authors. Furthermore, 10 (50%) did not mention policies regarding clinical trial registration. In addition, journals with policies regarding the CONSORT statement were more likely to publish trials with a CONSORT flow diagram, and journals with policies regarding clinical trial registry were more likely to publish trials reporting registration. Conclusion and Relevance Our study found that few plastic surgery journals mention reporting guidelines or trial registration in their instructions for authors. Our study also found that journal policies regarding guideline adherence and trial registration seem to be effective mechanisms toward improvement, and plastic surgery journals should consider adopting such policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-219
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Registries
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Guideline Adherence
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • CONSORT
  • equator
  • plastic surgery
  • randomized trials
  • reporting guidelines

Cite this

@article{6be1359d8290490ab9d11d9ecca61e5e,
title = "An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements among Plastic Surgery Journals",
abstract = "Background Ensuring that published studies are of the highest methodological quality is a critical step in plastic surgery's transition to a more evidence-based field. Reporting guidelines and reporting of clinical trial registration may serve as promising avenues of increasing the methodological quality in plastic surgery trials. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate at which plastic surgery journals require reporting guidelines, as well as the effect these policies have on adherence to reporting guidelines. Methods Using journal's {"}Instructions for Authors,{"} we conducted a cross-sectional survey to evaluate journal policies regarding adherence to reporting guidelines and trial registration. We also examined whether trials published in journals referencing Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) had higher rates of compliance with publishing a CONSORT flow diagram and whether journals with trial registration policies were more likely to contain registered trials than journals without these requirements. Results Of the 20 plastic surgery journals, 13 (65{\%}) did not mention a single guideline within their instructions to authors. Furthermore, 10 (50{\%}) did not mention policies regarding clinical trial registration. In addition, journals with policies regarding the CONSORT statement were more likely to publish trials with a CONSORT flow diagram, and journals with policies regarding clinical trial registry were more likely to publish trials reporting registration. Conclusion and Relevance Our study found that few plastic surgery journals mention reporting guidelines or trial registration in their instructions for authors. Our study also found that journal policies regarding guideline adherence and trial registration seem to be effective mechanisms toward improvement, and plastic surgery journals should consider adopting such policies.",
keywords = "CONSORT, equator, plastic surgery, randomized trials, reporting guidelines",
author = "Checketts, {Jake X.} and Courtney Cook and Saba Imani and Laurie Duckett and Matt Vassar",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SAP.0000000000001476",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "215--219",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements among Plastic Surgery Journals

AU - Checketts, Jake X.

AU - Cook, Courtney

AU - Imani, Saba

AU - Duckett, Laurie

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Background Ensuring that published studies are of the highest methodological quality is a critical step in plastic surgery's transition to a more evidence-based field. Reporting guidelines and reporting of clinical trial registration may serve as promising avenues of increasing the methodological quality in plastic surgery trials. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate at which plastic surgery journals require reporting guidelines, as well as the effect these policies have on adherence to reporting guidelines. Methods Using journal's "Instructions for Authors," we conducted a cross-sectional survey to evaluate journal policies regarding adherence to reporting guidelines and trial registration. We also examined whether trials published in journals referencing Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) had higher rates of compliance with publishing a CONSORT flow diagram and whether journals with trial registration policies were more likely to contain registered trials than journals without these requirements. Results Of the 20 plastic surgery journals, 13 (65%) did not mention a single guideline within their instructions to authors. Furthermore, 10 (50%) did not mention policies regarding clinical trial registration. In addition, journals with policies regarding the CONSORT statement were more likely to publish trials with a CONSORT flow diagram, and journals with policies regarding clinical trial registry were more likely to publish trials reporting registration. Conclusion and Relevance Our study found that few plastic surgery journals mention reporting guidelines or trial registration in their instructions for authors. Our study also found that journal policies regarding guideline adherence and trial registration seem to be effective mechanisms toward improvement, and plastic surgery journals should consider adopting such policies.

AB - Background Ensuring that published studies are of the highest methodological quality is a critical step in plastic surgery's transition to a more evidence-based field. Reporting guidelines and reporting of clinical trial registration may serve as promising avenues of increasing the methodological quality in plastic surgery trials. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate at which plastic surgery journals require reporting guidelines, as well as the effect these policies have on adherence to reporting guidelines. Methods Using journal's "Instructions for Authors," we conducted a cross-sectional survey to evaluate journal policies regarding adherence to reporting guidelines and trial registration. We also examined whether trials published in journals referencing Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) had higher rates of compliance with publishing a CONSORT flow diagram and whether journals with trial registration policies were more likely to contain registered trials than journals without these requirements. Results Of the 20 plastic surgery journals, 13 (65%) did not mention a single guideline within their instructions to authors. Furthermore, 10 (50%) did not mention policies regarding clinical trial registration. In addition, journals with policies regarding the CONSORT statement were more likely to publish trials with a CONSORT flow diagram, and journals with policies regarding clinical trial registry were more likely to publish trials reporting registration. Conclusion and Relevance Our study found that few plastic surgery journals mention reporting guidelines or trial registration in their instructions for authors. Our study also found that journal policies regarding guideline adherence and trial registration seem to be effective mechanisms toward improvement, and plastic surgery journals should consider adopting such policies.

KW - CONSORT

KW - equator

KW - plastic surgery

KW - randomized trials

KW - reporting guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050618093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001476

DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001476

M3 - Article

C2 - 29794510

AN - SCOPUS:85050618093

VL - 81

SP - 215

EP - 219

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 2

ER -