An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning

Beyzanur Cayir Ervural, Selim Zaim, Omer F. Demirel, Zeynep Aydin, Dursun Delen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Energy planning involves a perpetual process of reevaluating alternative energy strategies. Authorities responsible for energy planning and management have to adjust their strategies according to new and improved alternative solutions based on the sustainability criteria. In this study, we propose an integrated hybrid methodology for the analysis of Turkey's energy sector using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, Analytic Network Process (ANP) process, and weighted fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to formulate and holistically analyze the energy strategy alternatives and priorities. The methodology proposed in this study allowed identifying the relevant criteria and sub-criteria using a SWOT analysis. Then, ANP approach, which is one of the popular multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is employed to determine the weights of each SWOT factors and sub-factors. Finally, fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is conducted to prioritize alternative energy strategies. We discuss the obtained results for the development of long-range alternative energy strategies. The results showed that turning the country into an energy hub and an energy terminal by effectively using the geo-strategic position within the framework of the regional cooperation is the most important priority. On the other hand, using the nuclear energy technologies within the energy supply strategies found to be the least favored priority.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1538-1550
Number of pages13
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume82
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Planning
Nuclear energy
Sustainable development
Decision making

Keywords

  • Alternative energy
  • ANP
  • Fuzzy TOPSIS
  • MCDM
  • Renewable energy
  • Strategic energy planning
  • SWOT

Cite this

Cayir Ervural, Beyzanur ; Zaim, Selim ; Demirel, Omer F. ; Aydin, Zeynep ; Delen, Dursun. / An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018 ; Vol. 82. pp. 1538-1550.
@article{cfc215e1dff847a2ac610af3a3e7fbd4,
title = "An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning",
abstract = "Energy planning involves a perpetual process of reevaluating alternative energy strategies. Authorities responsible for energy planning and management have to adjust their strategies according to new and improved alternative solutions based on the sustainability criteria. In this study, we propose an integrated hybrid methodology for the analysis of Turkey's energy sector using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, Analytic Network Process (ANP) process, and weighted fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to formulate and holistically analyze the energy strategy alternatives and priorities. The methodology proposed in this study allowed identifying the relevant criteria and sub-criteria using a SWOT analysis. Then, ANP approach, which is one of the popular multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is employed to determine the weights of each SWOT factors and sub-factors. Finally, fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is conducted to prioritize alternative energy strategies. We discuss the obtained results for the development of long-range alternative energy strategies. The results showed that turning the country into an energy hub and an energy terminal by effectively using the geo-strategic position within the framework of the regional cooperation is the most important priority. On the other hand, using the nuclear energy technologies within the energy supply strategies found to be the least favored priority.",
keywords = "Alternative energy, ANP, Fuzzy TOPSIS, MCDM, Renewable energy, Strategic energy planning, SWOT",
author = "{Cayir Ervural}, Beyzanur and Selim Zaim and Demirel, {Omer F.} and Zeynep Aydin and Dursun Delen",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.095",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "1538--1550",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning. / Cayir Ervural, Beyzanur; Zaim, Selim; Demirel, Omer F.; Aydin, Zeynep; Delen, Dursun.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 82, 01.02.2018, p. 1538-1550.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning

AU - Cayir Ervural, Beyzanur

AU - Zaim, Selim

AU - Demirel, Omer F.

AU - Aydin, Zeynep

AU - Delen, Dursun

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Energy planning involves a perpetual process of reevaluating alternative energy strategies. Authorities responsible for energy planning and management have to adjust their strategies according to new and improved alternative solutions based on the sustainability criteria. In this study, we propose an integrated hybrid methodology for the analysis of Turkey's energy sector using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, Analytic Network Process (ANP) process, and weighted fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to formulate and holistically analyze the energy strategy alternatives and priorities. The methodology proposed in this study allowed identifying the relevant criteria and sub-criteria using a SWOT analysis. Then, ANP approach, which is one of the popular multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is employed to determine the weights of each SWOT factors and sub-factors. Finally, fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is conducted to prioritize alternative energy strategies. We discuss the obtained results for the development of long-range alternative energy strategies. The results showed that turning the country into an energy hub and an energy terminal by effectively using the geo-strategic position within the framework of the regional cooperation is the most important priority. On the other hand, using the nuclear energy technologies within the energy supply strategies found to be the least favored priority.

AB - Energy planning involves a perpetual process of reevaluating alternative energy strategies. Authorities responsible for energy planning and management have to adjust their strategies according to new and improved alternative solutions based on the sustainability criteria. In this study, we propose an integrated hybrid methodology for the analysis of Turkey's energy sector using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, Analytic Network Process (ANP) process, and weighted fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to formulate and holistically analyze the energy strategy alternatives and priorities. The methodology proposed in this study allowed identifying the relevant criteria and sub-criteria using a SWOT analysis. Then, ANP approach, which is one of the popular multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is employed to determine the weights of each SWOT factors and sub-factors. Finally, fuzzy TOPSIS methodology is conducted to prioritize alternative energy strategies. We discuss the obtained results for the development of long-range alternative energy strategies. The results showed that turning the country into an energy hub and an energy terminal by effectively using the geo-strategic position within the framework of the regional cooperation is the most important priority. On the other hand, using the nuclear energy technologies within the energy supply strategies found to be the least favored priority.

KW - Alternative energy

KW - ANP

KW - Fuzzy TOPSIS

KW - MCDM

KW - Renewable energy

KW - Strategic energy planning

KW - SWOT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028355527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.095

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.095

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85028355527

VL - 82

SP - 1538

EP - 1550

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -