An analysis of the literature addressing tonsillectomy knowledge gaps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Importance: The ability of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes depends on the quality of evidence that they are built upon. Research into tonsillectomy in children is lacking, and the gaps in evidence were identified by guideline authors. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent that new research is addressing the gaps identified in the AAO-HNS Tonsillectomy in Children Guideline. Design: For each recommendation in the AAO-HNS guideline Tonsillectomy In Children, we created PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and search strings. PubMed was searched to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAO-HNS work group. These studies were then extracted and analyzed. Setting: This study is relevant to all invested in focusing otolaryngological research on questions which currently lack strong evidence. Participants: Trials in tonsillectomy that started after the development of the AAO-HNS clinical practice guidelines. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures of this study is the extent to which tonsillectomy research is addressing the evidence gaps listed in the clinical practice guideline. Results: Of the 2519 studies included in our sample, 276 (11%) were relevant to the 18 recommendations made within the Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Patients clinical practice guideline. All but one of the recommendations was met by at least one study. Conclusions: and Relevance: Our findings indicate that knowledge gaps within the guideline at publication may have since been addressed and a guideline update may thus be warranted. Level of evidence: NA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-93
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume115
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Tonsillectomy
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
PubMed
Publications
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Evidence based medicine
  • Research gaps
  • Tonsillectomy

Cite this

@article{26c1da990cfb4cab848724c4a53d925d,
title = "An analysis of the literature addressing tonsillectomy knowledge gaps",
abstract = "Importance: The ability of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes depends on the quality of evidence that they are built upon. Research into tonsillectomy in children is lacking, and the gaps in evidence were identified by guideline authors. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent that new research is addressing the gaps identified in the AAO-HNS Tonsillectomy in Children Guideline. Design: For each recommendation in the AAO-HNS guideline Tonsillectomy In Children, we created PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and search strings. PubMed was searched to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAO-HNS work group. These studies were then extracted and analyzed. Setting: This study is relevant to all invested in focusing otolaryngological research on questions which currently lack strong evidence. Participants: Trials in tonsillectomy that started after the development of the AAO-HNS clinical practice guidelines. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures of this study is the extent to which tonsillectomy research is addressing the evidence gaps listed in the clinical practice guideline. Results: Of the 2519 studies included in our sample, 276 (11{\%}) were relevant to the 18 recommendations made within the Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Patients clinical practice guideline. All but one of the recommendations was met by at least one study. Conclusions: and Relevance: Our findings indicate that knowledge gaps within the guideline at publication may have since been addressed and a guideline update may thus be warranted. Level of evidence: NA.",
keywords = "Evidence based medicine, Research gaps, Tonsillectomy",
author = "Cooper, {Craig M.} and Checketts, {Jake X.} and Lacy Brame and Harrison Gray and Downs, {Jaye Bea} and Matt Vassar",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.027",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "89--93",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of the literature addressing tonsillectomy knowledge gaps

AU - Cooper, Craig M.

AU - Checketts, Jake X.

AU - Brame, Lacy

AU - Gray, Harrison

AU - Downs, Jaye Bea

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Importance: The ability of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes depends on the quality of evidence that they are built upon. Research into tonsillectomy in children is lacking, and the gaps in evidence were identified by guideline authors. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent that new research is addressing the gaps identified in the AAO-HNS Tonsillectomy in Children Guideline. Design: For each recommendation in the AAO-HNS guideline Tonsillectomy In Children, we created PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and search strings. PubMed was searched to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAO-HNS work group. These studies were then extracted and analyzed. Setting: This study is relevant to all invested in focusing otolaryngological research on questions which currently lack strong evidence. Participants: Trials in tonsillectomy that started after the development of the AAO-HNS clinical practice guidelines. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures of this study is the extent to which tonsillectomy research is addressing the evidence gaps listed in the clinical practice guideline. Results: Of the 2519 studies included in our sample, 276 (11%) were relevant to the 18 recommendations made within the Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Patients clinical practice guideline. All but one of the recommendations was met by at least one study. Conclusions: and Relevance: Our findings indicate that knowledge gaps within the guideline at publication may have since been addressed and a guideline update may thus be warranted. Level of evidence: NA.

AB - Importance: The ability of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes depends on the quality of evidence that they are built upon. Research into tonsillectomy in children is lacking, and the gaps in evidence were identified by guideline authors. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent that new research is addressing the gaps identified in the AAO-HNS Tonsillectomy in Children Guideline. Design: For each recommendation in the AAO-HNS guideline Tonsillectomy In Children, we created PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and search strings. PubMed was searched to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAO-HNS work group. These studies were then extracted and analyzed. Setting: This study is relevant to all invested in focusing otolaryngological research on questions which currently lack strong evidence. Participants: Trials in tonsillectomy that started after the development of the AAO-HNS clinical practice guidelines. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures of this study is the extent to which tonsillectomy research is addressing the evidence gaps listed in the clinical practice guideline. Results: Of the 2519 studies included in our sample, 276 (11%) were relevant to the 18 recommendations made within the Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Patients clinical practice guideline. All but one of the recommendations was met by at least one study. Conclusions: and Relevance: Our findings indicate that knowledge gaps within the guideline at publication may have since been addressed and a guideline update may thus be warranted. Level of evidence: NA.

KW - Evidence based medicine

KW - Research gaps

KW - Tonsillectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054066126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.09.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 30368401

AN - SCOPUS:85054066126

VL - 115

SP - 89

EP - 93

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

ER -