Absolute Versus Relative Fracture Fixation: Impact on Fracture Healing

Brent L. Norris, Gerald Lang, Thomas A.Toney Russell, David L. Rothberg, William M. Ricci, Joseph Borrelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The goals of all orthopaedic surgeons treating fractures are, and will remain, obtaining union of the fracture with a wellaligned and functional limb while minimizing the risk of complications. This requires us to understand how the biomechanical environment of the fracture affects healing and to be able to discern which mechanical environment is preferred over another. Understanding the spectrum of stability imparted by our current surgical devices is paramount to giving our patients the best opportunity to heal and recover from their injury. Gone are the simplistic views of plates and screws being applied for absolute stability and nails and external fixators being applied for relative stability. This review sheds new light on how the use of different implants provides the appropriate stability to encourage fracture healing and limit the risk of complication and loss of function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S12-S16
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume32
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Fracture Fixation
Fracture Healing
External Fixators
Nails
Extremities
Equipment and Supplies
Wounds and Injuries
Orthopedic Surgeons

Keywords

  • Absolute
  • Fracture fixation
  • Healing
  • Osteoporosis
  • Relative
  • Stability

Cite this

Norris, Brent L. ; Lang, Gerald ; Russell, Thomas A.Toney ; Rothberg, David L. ; Ricci, William M. ; Borrelli, Joseph. / Absolute Versus Relative Fracture Fixation : Impact on Fracture Healing. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2018 ; Vol. 32. pp. S12-S16.
@article{bcbe8e278715487c85d382f57e652177,
title = "Absolute Versus Relative Fracture Fixation: Impact on Fracture Healing",
abstract = "The goals of all orthopaedic surgeons treating fractures are, and will remain, obtaining union of the fracture with a wellaligned and functional limb while minimizing the risk of complications. This requires us to understand how the biomechanical environment of the fracture affects healing and to be able to discern which mechanical environment is preferred over another. Understanding the spectrum of stability imparted by our current surgical devices is paramount to giving our patients the best opportunity to heal and recover from their injury. Gone are the simplistic views of plates and screws being applied for absolute stability and nails and external fixators being applied for relative stability. This review sheds new light on how the use of different implants provides the appropriate stability to encourage fracture healing and limit the risk of complication and loss of function.",
keywords = "Absolute, Fracture fixation, Healing, Osteoporosis, Relative, Stability",
author = "Norris, {Brent L.} and Gerald Lang and Russell, {Thomas A.Toney} and Rothberg, {David L.} and Ricci, {William M.} and Joseph Borrelli",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000001124",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "S12--S16",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

}

Absolute Versus Relative Fracture Fixation : Impact on Fracture Healing. / Norris, Brent L.; Lang, Gerald; Russell, Thomas A.Toney; Rothberg, David L.; Ricci, William M.; Borrelli, Joseph.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 32, 01.03.2018, p. S12-S16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute Versus Relative Fracture Fixation

T2 - Impact on Fracture Healing

AU - Norris, Brent L.

AU - Lang, Gerald

AU - Russell, Thomas A.Toney

AU - Rothberg, David L.

AU - Ricci, William M.

AU - Borrelli, Joseph

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - The goals of all orthopaedic surgeons treating fractures are, and will remain, obtaining union of the fracture with a wellaligned and functional limb while minimizing the risk of complications. This requires us to understand how the biomechanical environment of the fracture affects healing and to be able to discern which mechanical environment is preferred over another. Understanding the spectrum of stability imparted by our current surgical devices is paramount to giving our patients the best opportunity to heal and recover from their injury. Gone are the simplistic views of plates and screws being applied for absolute stability and nails and external fixators being applied for relative stability. This review sheds new light on how the use of different implants provides the appropriate stability to encourage fracture healing and limit the risk of complication and loss of function.

AB - The goals of all orthopaedic surgeons treating fractures are, and will remain, obtaining union of the fracture with a wellaligned and functional limb while minimizing the risk of complications. This requires us to understand how the biomechanical environment of the fracture affects healing and to be able to discern which mechanical environment is preferred over another. Understanding the spectrum of stability imparted by our current surgical devices is paramount to giving our patients the best opportunity to heal and recover from their injury. Gone are the simplistic views of plates and screws being applied for absolute stability and nails and external fixators being applied for relative stability. This review sheds new light on how the use of different implants provides the appropriate stability to encourage fracture healing and limit the risk of complication and loss of function.

KW - Absolute

KW - Fracture fixation

KW - Healing

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Relative

KW - Stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044045512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001124

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001124

M3 - Article

C2 - 29461396

AN - SCOPUS:85044045512

VL - 32

SP - S12-S16

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

ER -