A review of research efforts to address the 2008 ACEP guideline for mild traumatic brain injury

Jack Manquen, Tyler Combs, Anna Mazur-Mosiewicz, Donald Sanders, Michael Schiesel, Joshua Gordon, Michelle Farabough, Matt Vassar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between clinical practice guideline development and subsequent research performed, with the goal of providing more data on areas of sparse evidence that serve to underlie guideline recommendations. We aimed to assess the quality of current research efforts to address the American College of Emergency Physicians guideline and to provide suggestions for future research of mild traumatic brain injury. Methods: We identified clinical practice guideline recommendations with low levels of underlying evidence and searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trial Registry Portal to determine whether subsequent research has reflected an effort to address guideline recommendations. Results: Few currently registered clinical trials attempt to focus on clinical practice guideline recommendations where the basis of evidence is weak, and even fewer might benefit future iterations of the guideline due to multiple problems in study design and reporting. Conclusions: The amount of research dedicated to investigation of mild traumatic brain injury continues to be sparse and of poor quality. Study results should always be posted, even if the null hypothesis is confirmed. Efforts to improve the evidence base of a guideline should be realized by designing studies that directly assess and speak to the questions posed by guideline authors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Brain Concussion
Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Research
Clinical Trials
Registries
2-amino-3-cyano-6-ethyl-5-(4-pyridyl)pyridine

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Emergency medicine
  • Research gaps
  • Traumatic brain injury

Cite this

@article{aef95b88fcd44be1b42a02b284f2c296,
title = "A review of research efforts to address the 2008 ACEP guideline for mild traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between clinical practice guideline development and subsequent research performed, with the goal of providing more data on areas of sparse evidence that serve to underlie guideline recommendations. We aimed to assess the quality of current research efforts to address the American College of Emergency Physicians guideline and to provide suggestions for future research of mild traumatic brain injury. Methods: We identified clinical practice guideline recommendations with low levels of underlying evidence and searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trial Registry Portal to determine whether subsequent research has reflected an effort to address guideline recommendations. Results: Few currently registered clinical trials attempt to focus on clinical practice guideline recommendations where the basis of evidence is weak, and even fewer might benefit future iterations of the guideline due to multiple problems in study design and reporting. Conclusions: The amount of research dedicated to investigation of mild traumatic brain injury continues to be sparse and of poor quality. Study results should always be posted, even if the null hypothesis is confirmed. Efforts to improve the evidence base of a guideline should be realized by designing studies that directly assess and speak to the questions posed by guideline authors.",
keywords = "Clinical practice guidelines, Emergency medicine, Research gaps, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Jack Manquen and Tyler Combs and Anna Mazur-Mosiewicz and Donald Sanders and Michael Schiesel and Joshua Gordon and Michelle Farabough and Matt Vassar",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.061",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "73--79",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A review of research efforts to address the 2008 ACEP guideline for mild traumatic brain injury. / Manquen, Jack; Combs, Tyler; Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anna; Sanders, Donald; Schiesel, Michael; Gordon, Joshua; Farabough, Michelle; Vassar, Matt.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 73-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of research efforts to address the 2008 ACEP guideline for mild traumatic brain injury

AU - Manquen, Jack

AU - Combs, Tyler

AU - Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anna

AU - Sanders, Donald

AU - Schiesel, Michael

AU - Gordon, Joshua

AU - Farabough, Michelle

AU - Vassar, Matt

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between clinical practice guideline development and subsequent research performed, with the goal of providing more data on areas of sparse evidence that serve to underlie guideline recommendations. We aimed to assess the quality of current research efforts to address the American College of Emergency Physicians guideline and to provide suggestions for future research of mild traumatic brain injury. Methods: We identified clinical practice guideline recommendations with low levels of underlying evidence and searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trial Registry Portal to determine whether subsequent research has reflected an effort to address guideline recommendations. Results: Few currently registered clinical trials attempt to focus on clinical practice guideline recommendations where the basis of evidence is weak, and even fewer might benefit future iterations of the guideline due to multiple problems in study design and reporting. Conclusions: The amount of research dedicated to investigation of mild traumatic brain injury continues to be sparse and of poor quality. Study results should always be posted, even if the null hypothesis is confirmed. Efforts to improve the evidence base of a guideline should be realized by designing studies that directly assess and speak to the questions posed by guideline authors.

AB - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between clinical practice guideline development and subsequent research performed, with the goal of providing more data on areas of sparse evidence that serve to underlie guideline recommendations. We aimed to assess the quality of current research efforts to address the American College of Emergency Physicians guideline and to provide suggestions for future research of mild traumatic brain injury. Methods: We identified clinical practice guideline recommendations with low levels of underlying evidence and searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trial Registry Portal to determine whether subsequent research has reflected an effort to address guideline recommendations. Results: Few currently registered clinical trials attempt to focus on clinical practice guideline recommendations where the basis of evidence is weak, and even fewer might benefit future iterations of the guideline due to multiple problems in study design and reporting. Conclusions: The amount of research dedicated to investigation of mild traumatic brain injury continues to be sparse and of poor quality. Study results should always be posted, even if the null hypothesis is confirmed. Efforts to improve the evidence base of a guideline should be realized by designing studies that directly assess and speak to the questions posed by guideline authors.

KW - Clinical practice guidelines

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Research gaps

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047091271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.061

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.061

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047091271

VL - 37

SP - 73

EP - 79

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 1

ER -