Research output per year
Research output per year
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics where Caitlin McCormick is active. These topic labels come from the works of this person. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Similar Profiles
Research output
- 5 Poster
-
Assessing the Changes in Outcome Measurements in Randomized Controlled Trials of Regional Anesthesia Interventions: A Registry-Publication Comparison Study
McCormick, C., Waller, D., Langerman, R., Elghzali, A., Corwin, L., Harris, T., Hazlitt, R., Archer, D., Ford, A. & Vassar, M., 22 Aug 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
-
Assessing the Changes in Outcome Measurements in Randomized Controlled Trials of Regional Anesthesia Interventions: A Registry-Publication Comparison Study
McCormick, C., Waller, D., Elghzali, A., Corwin, L., Harris, T., Hazlitt, R., Archer, D., Khan, A., Ford, A. & Vassar, M., 12 Sep 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
-
Endorsement of Artificial Intelligence Guidelines Across Leading Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Analysis
McCormick, C., Profice, T., Rowsey, K., Brassfield, J., Shumard, A., Crotty, P., Tran, A. V., Young, A., Ford, A. I. & Vassar, M., 14 Feb 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
Open Access -
Endorsement of Artificial Intelligence Guidelines Across Leading Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Analysis
McCormick, C., Profice, T., Rowsey, K., Brassfield, J., Shumard, A., Crotty, P., Tran, A. V., Young, A., Ford, A. I. & Vassar, M., 25 Jun 2025.Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
-
Endorsement of Artificial Intelligence Guidelines Across Leading Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Analysis
McCormick, C., Brassfield, J., Young, A., Shumard, A., Tran, A., Rowsey, K., Crotty, P., Profice, T., Ford, A. & Vassar, M., 7 Mar 2025, p. 45.Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review